Improved model quality assessment using ProQ2

@article{Ray2012ImprovedMQ,
  title={Improved model quality assessment using ProQ2},
  author={Arjun Ray and Erik Lindahl and Bj{\"o}rn Wallner},
  journal={BMC Bioinformatics},
  year={2012},
  volume={13},
  pages={224 - 224}
}
BackgroundEmploying methods to assess the quality of modeled protein structures is now standard practice in bioinformatics. In a broad sense, the techniques can be divided into methods relying on consensus prediction on the one hand, and single-model methods on the other. Consensus methods frequently perform very well when there is a clear consensus, but this is not always the case. In particular, they frequently fail in selecting the best possible model in the hard cases (lacking consensus) or… 

ProQ2: estimation of model accuracy implemented in Rosetta

Based on results from CASP11 and CAMEO-QE, a continuous benchmark of quality estimation methods, it is clear that ProQ2 is the single-model method that performs best in both local and global model accuracy.

Machine learning methods for evaluating the quality of a single protein model using energy and structural properties

New machine learning based methods are developed for single-model QA and top-model selection from a pool of candidates based on a comprehensive set of model structure features, such as matching of secondary structure and solvent accessibility, as well as existing potential or energy function scores.

Two New Heuristic Methods for Protein Model Quality Assessment

Two new heuristic QA methods that assesses the model quality based on the known protein structures with similar sequences and have been blindly tested in the CASP12 world-wide competition and ranked as top performers in their respective categories.

ProQ3: Improved model quality assessments using Rosetta energy terms

Two novel methods are introduced, inspired by the state-of-art method ProQ2, but using a completely different description of a protein model, based on Rosetta energies, and it is shown that combining the input features from all three predictors, the resulting predictor ProQ3 performs better than any of the individual methods.

Improved protein model quality assessments by changing the target function

An updated version of ProQ3D is provided that predicts local and global model quality estimates based on different quality estimates, and finds that the c ntact-based methods are easier to predict and that predictors trained on these measures provide some advantages when it comes to identifying the best model.

Protein model quality assessment by learning-to-rank

A novel method has been presented to rank the models by their relative qualities and it is demonstrated that the proposed method is an effective methodology for model quality assessment and provides the state-of-the-art performance.

Machine Learning Approaches for Quality Assessment of Protein Structures

This review systematically review all the major ML-based EMA methods developed within the past ten years and provides an introductory guide to modern research on protein quality assessment and directions for future research in this area.

Large-scale model quality assessment for improving protein tertiary structure prediction

A novel large-scale model QA method in conjunction with model clustering to rank and select protein structural models and MULTICOM’s outstanding performance in the extremely competitive 2014 CASP11 experiment proves that this approach is a promising solution to one of the two major problems in protein structure modeling.

MASS: predict the global qualities of individual protein models using random forests and novel statistical potentials

MASS outperforms almost all of the four CASP11 top-performing single-model methods for global quality assessment in terms of all ofthe four evaluation criteria officially used by CASP, which measure the abilities to assign relative and absolute scores, identify the best model from decoys, and distinguish between good and bad models.

Smooth orientation-dependent scoring function for coarse-grained protein quality assessment

A novel single-model QA method called SBROD (Smooth Backbone-Reliant Orientation-Dependent) method, which uses only the backbone protein conformation, and hence it can be applied to scoring coarse-grained protein models, which is potentially applicable to continuous gradient-based optimization of protein conformations.
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 46 REFERENCES

MaxSub: an automated measure for the assessment of protein structure prediction quality

This work investigates the suitability of a fully automated, simple, objective, quantitative and reproducible method that can be used in the automatic assessment of models in the upcoming CAFASP2 experiment and concludes that MaxSub is a suitable method for the automatic evaluation of models.

Model quality assessment for membrane proteins

This work shows that it is possible to improve performance significantly by restricting the learning space to a specific context, in this case membrane proteins, and shows that the combination of ProQM and the Rosetta low-resolution energy function achieve a 7-fold enrichment in selection of near-native structural models, at very limited computational cost.

QMEANclust: estimation of protein model quality by combining a composite scoring function with structural density information

Improved model selection is obtained by using a composite scoring function operating on single models in order to enrich higher quality models which are subsequently used to calculate the structural consensus.

MetaMQAP: A meta-server for the quality assessment of protein models

MetaMQAP is a meta-predictor based on a multivariate regression model, which uses scores of the above-mentioned methods, but in which trivial parameters are controlled, and is the best among methods capable of evaluating just single models.

Global and local model quality estimation at CASP8 using the scoring functions QMEAN and QMEANclust

The QMEANclust consensus scoring function turned out to be a successful method both for the ranking of entire models but especially for the estimation of the per‐residue model quality, in the context of what went right and wrong at CASP8.

Evaluation of model quality predictions in CASP9

These evaluations demonstrate that even though global quality assessment methods seem to approach perfection point (weighted average per‐target Pearson's correlation coefficients are as high as 0.97 for the best groups), there is still room for improvement in these methods.

Identification of correct regions in protein models using structural, alignment, and consensus information

This study presents two methods to predict the local quality of a protein model: ProQres and ProQprof and proposes a simple approach based on local consensus, Pcons‐local.

Model quality assessment using distance constraints from alignments

A new approach is presented, based on distance constraints extracted from alignments to templates of known structure, and is implemented in the Undertaker program for protein structure prediction, that is at least comparable with the best MQA methods that were assessed at CASP7.

An iterative self‐refining and self‐evaluating approach for protein model quality estimation

An iterative approach that improves the performances of protein Model Quality Assurance Programs (MQAPs) by iteratively refines the scores until the ranking of the models does not change, and can achieve a high accuracy similar to a full pair‐wise clustering method, but with much less computation time when evaluating hundreds of models.

Toward the estimation of the absolute quality of individual protein structure models

The ability of the newly introduced QMEAN Z-score to detect experimentally solved protein structures containing significant errors, as well as to evaluate theoretical protein models is demonstrated.