Implicit and Explicit Forgetting: When is Gist Remembered?

@article{Dorfman1994ImplicitAE,
  title={Implicit and Explicit Forgetting: When is Gist Remembered?},
  author={J. Dorfman and G. Mandler},
  journal={Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology},
  year={1994},
  volume={47},
  pages={651 - 672}
}
  • J. Dorfman, G. Mandler
  • Published 1994
  • Psychology, Medicine
  • Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
  • Recognition (YES/NO) and stem completion (cued: complete with a word from the list; and uncued: complete with the first word that comes to mind) were tested following either semantic or non-semantic processing of a categorized input list. Item/instance information was tested by contrasting target items from the input list with new items that were categorically related to them; gist/categorical information was tested by comparing target items semantically related to the input items with… CONTINUE READING
    25 Citations

    Figures, Tables, and Topics from this paper

    Explore Further: Topics Discussed in This Paper

    Using what we know: Consequences of intentionally retrieving gist versus item-specific information.
    • 21
    • PDF
    What do we know about what we cannot remember? Accessing the semantic attributes of words that cannot be recalled.
    • 70
    • PDF
    Retroactive interference effects in implicit memory.
    • 9
    Intentional forgetting diminishes memory for continuous events
    • 18
    • Highly Influenced
    Control Processes in Remembering
    • 28
    • Highly Influenced
    • PDF
    The Basic-Level Convergence Effect in Memory Distortions
    • 40
    • PDF
    Cognitive and Metacognitive Determinants of Eyewitness Memory Accuracy over Time.
    • 2
    Strategic regulation of grain size in memory reporting.
    • 124
    • PDF
    Priming and recognition in ECT-induced amnesia
    • 29
    • PDF

    References

    SHOWING 1-10 OF 43 REFERENCES
    Tests of Dual Process Theory: Word Priming and Recognition
    • 85
    Implicit and explicit memory for new associations in normal and amnesic subjects.
    • P. Graf, D. Schacter
    • Psychology, Medicine
    • Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition
    • 1985
    • 1,611
    • PDF
    The information that amnesic patients do not forget.
    • 600
    • Highly Influential
    Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence.
    • 2,583
    • PDF