• DOI:10.1177/0146167293195015
• Corpus ID: 145626421

Implicit Theories Individual Differences in the Likelihood and Meaning of Dispositional Inference

@article{Dweck1993ImplicitTI,
  title={Implicit Theories Individual Differences in the Likelihood and Meaning of Dispositional Inference},
  author={Carol S. Dweck and Ying-yi Hong and Chi-yue Chiu},
  journal={Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin},
  year={1993},
  volume={19},
  pages={644 - 656}
}

• C. Dweck, Ying-yi Hong, C. Chiu
• Published 1 October 1993
• Psychology, Philosophy
• Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

In their research, the authors have identified individuals who believe that a particular trait (intelligence, personality, or moral character) is a fixed disposition (entity theorists) and have contrasted them with those who believe the trait to be a malleable quality (incremental theorists). Research shows that an entity theory consistently predicts (a) global dispositional inferences for self and other; even in the face of limited evidence, as well as (b) an over reliance on dispositional information in making other judgments and decisions. An incremental theory, by contrast, predicts inferences that are more specific, conditional, and provisional The implicit beliefs seem to represent not only different theories about the nature of traits but also different mental models about how personality works-what the units of analysis are and how they enter into causal relations. Implications for the literature on person perception are discussed.