Imperial Manila: How institutions and political geography disadvantage Philippine provinces

  title={Imperial Manila: How institutions and political geography disadvantage Philippine provinces},
  author={Rollin F. Tusalem},
  journal={Asian Journal of Comparative Politics},
  pages={235 - 269}
  • Rollin F. Tusalem
  • Published 2020
  • Political Science
  • Asian Journal of Comparative Politics
  • Critics of Philippine democracy have pointed out that the unitary system employed since the country became a sovereign state in 1946 led to the prolonged underdevelopment of sub-national regions (provinces). Hence, policy makers have put forward the argument that a shift to a Federal system is necessary because of the imperial Manila syndrome. This is the notion that political, economic, and social underdevelopment is more prevalent the farther away a province is from the capital, Metro-Manila… CONTINUE READING
    1 Citations

    Figures and Tables from this paper


    Caught between Imperial Manila and the Provincial Dynasties: Towards a New Fiscal Federalism
    • 2
    • PDF
    Elites in Local Development in the Philippines
    • 17
    Devolution and Regional Disparities in the Philippines: Is There a Connection?
    • 29
    An anarchy of families : state and family in the Philippines
    • 216
    Does Political Stability Hinder Economic Development? Mancur Olson's Theory and the Third World
    • 55
    Federalism and the Politics of Macroeconomic Policy and Performance
    • 199
    Spatial Disparities and Poverty: The Case of Three Provinces in the Philippines
    • 1
    • Highly Influential