Impacts Towards a comprehensive assessment of the book impact by integrating multiple evaluation sources

  title={Impacts Towards a comprehensive assessment of the book impact by integrating multiple evaluation sources},
  author={Qingqing Zhou and Chengzhi Zhang},
  journal={J. Informetrics},
  • Qingqing Zhou, Chengzhi Zhang
  • Published 2021
  • Computer Science
  • J. Informetrics
Abstract The surge in the number of books published makes the manual evaluation methods (e.g. peer review) difficult to efficiently evaluate books. The use of books’ citations and alternative evaluation metrics (e.g. library holdings, social media mentions, book reviews) can assist manual evaluation and reduce the cost of evaluation. However, most existing evaluation research was based on a single evaluation source with coarse-grained analysis, which may obtain incomprehensive or one-sided… Expand


Measuring book impact via content-level academic review mining
The analysis results reveal that fine-grained mining of academic reviews can help users quickly understand multi-dimensional features of books, judge or predict the impacts of mass books, so as to provide references for different types of users in book selection. Expand
Measuring book impact based on the multi-granularity online review mining
It is inferred that online reviews represent a promising source for mining book impact within the altmetric perspective and at the multi-granularity content level, and might also be a means by which to measure other books besides academic publications. Expand
The power of book reviews: a simple and transparent enhancement approach for book citation indexes
This study confirms that books with book reviews do not remain uncited and accrue a remarkable mean number of citations, therefore, book reviews can be considered a suitable selection criterion for BKCIs. Expand
Examining differences among book reviews from various online platforms
The results show that book reviews on e-commerce websites contain information about external aspects of a book, while those on social network websites pay more attention to content-related aspects of the book and make it hard to evaluate book comprehensively based on single-source data. Expand
Alternative Metrics for Book Impact Assessment: Can Choice Reviews be a Useful Source?
Metrics derived from Choice academic book reviews can be used as indicators of different aspects of the value of books but more evidence is needed before they could be use as proxies for peer judgements about individual books. Expand
Can reviews help to assess the wider impacts of books?
Metrics based on online reviews are recommended for the evaluation of books that aim at a wide audience inside or outside academia when it is important to capture the broader impacts of educational or cultural activities and when they cannot be manipulated in advance of the evaluation. Expand
Assessing books' depth and breadth via multi-level mining on tables of contents
This paper measured books’ depth and breadth based on books�’ tables of contents via two levels: topic level and feature level, and compareddepth and breadth metrics and other book assessment metrics. Expand
Goodreads reviews to assess the wider impacts of books
Low and moderate correlations between Goodreads book metrics and scholarly or non‐scholarly indicators suggest that reader feedback in Goodreads reflects the many purposes of books rather than a single type of impact. Expand
Filling the citation gap: measuring the multidimensional impact of the academic book at institutional level with PlumX
A low presence of altmetric indicators for monographs is observed, even lower than for journal articles and a predominance of library holdings, confirming this indicator as the most promising one towards the analysis of the impact of books. Expand
Book reviews in humanities research evaluations
Overall, citation counts to book reviews are typically low, but the data showed that they are scholarly and do play a role in the scholarly communication system. Expand