Impact factor bias and proposed adjustments for its determination

  title={Impact factor bias and proposed adjustments for its determination},
  author={Argyro Fassoulaki and Konstantinos Papilas and Adia Paraskeva and Konstantinos Patris},
  journal={Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica},
Background: The impact factor (IF), a qualitative parameter used to evaluate scientific journals, has several flaws. The aim of the study was to evaluate two of its important constraints, journal self‐citation and scientific field, and to investigate the potential for improvement. 
Impact factor of a scientific journal: Is it a measure of quality of research?
Publications in reputed journals is one of the criteria often used by research and scientific organizations to evaluate the potential and aptness of a researcher in recruitment, promotions, research
Analysis of self‐citation and impact factor in dermatology journals
Concerns have been raised regarding the impact factor's (IF) accuracy and credibility, which may be affected by different factors, including self‐citations.
Understanding the limitations of the journal impact factor.
  • A. Kurmis
  • Business
    The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume
  • 2003
Those who choose to use the impact factor as a comparative tool should be aware of the nature and premise of its derivation and also of its inherent flaws and practical limitations.
[Reflections on the impact factor].
This paper focuses on the nature of journal impact factor and on international bibliographic indexes maintained by the Institute for the Scientific Information (ISI), namely Science Citation Index (SCI) Expanded, ISI Alerting Services and Current.
Reflections on the Impact Factor
Scientometric indicators, and particularly journal impact factor, are widely misunderstood and often used inappropriately. This reflection serves as the starting point for this paper on both the
Origins of measures of journal impact: Historical contingencies and their effect on current use
This paper examines the genesis of journal impact measures and how their evolution culminated in the journal impact factor (JIF) produced by the Institute for Scientific Information. The paper shows
Origins of Measures of Journal Impact : Historical Contingencies and Their Consequences on Current Use 1
This paper examines the genesis of journal impact measures and how their evolution culminated in the journal impact factor (JIF) produced by the Institute for Scientific Information. The paper shows
Impact factor and the need for its improvement among indexed journals of Pakistan.
  • M. Nasrullah
  • Computer Science
    Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan : JCPSP
  • 2011
The scientific world now a days revolve around publishing studies in sound peer reviewed journals to increase the visibility of the studies, to use them for future research studies, and devising
Comparison of Web of Science and Scopus Impact Factors of Indian Journals
Database coverage of Indian journals in Web of Science and Scopus was identified and it was found that Scopus covers more impact factor-tracked Indian journals, while Web of science covers 45 journals with impact factor.
Journal visibility, self-citation, and reference limits: influences on Impact Factor and author performance review
Bibliometrics, including the Journal Impact Factor (JIF), assist decision-making in pub- lishing and academic reviews. Some 'cutting edge' papers are not published in 'high ranking' jour- nals


Fortnightly Review: How can impact factors be improved?
Fourteen year cumulative impact data for 10 leading medical journals provide a quantitative indicator of their long term influence.
Impact factors need to be improved
Eugene Garfield's suggestions for improving the validity of the number of citations per article are welcomed but the final sentence of the summary hardly fits the title and finds little support in the rest of the article.
Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research
Alternative methods for evaluating research are being sought, such as citation rates and journal impact factors, which seem to be quantitative and objective indicators directly related to published science.
Citation analysis and journal impact factors – is the tail wagging the dog?
  • S. Gisvold
  • Education
    Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
  • 1999
There has been a marked tendency to use the journal impact factors indiscriminately as the one and only measure of research quality during the last years, and readers, scientists and academic leaders should know better.
Self-citations in six anaesthesia journals and their significance in determining the impact factor.
Investigation of self-citations in the 1995 and 1996 issues of six anaesthesia journals found a significant correlation betweenSelf-citing rates and impact factors was found and a high self- citing rate of a journal may positively affect its impact factor.
What is happening to the quality of research — and how can quality be measured?
  • S. Gisvold
  • Medicine
    Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
  • 1995
Quality may be in danger in the midst of the increasing number of journals, abstract journals and data bases and there is a tendency to evaluate researchers and rcscarch groups by the number of articles they produce, thus encouraging multiple and redundant publications.
Journal accused of manipulating impact factor
The journal Leukemia , which is owned by Macmillan magazines, has been accused of trying to manipulate its impact factor, the measure used to rank the importance of scientific journals. The
Academic anesthesiologists’ views on the importance of the impact factor of scientific journals: a North American and European survey
IF for academic appointments and funding is more important in Europe than in North America and more than 50% of anesthesiologists agree that IF needs to be improved.
Impact factors in anaesthesia journals.
  • G. Smith
  • Medicine
    British journal of anaesthesia
  • 1996
Philadelphia: Institute for Scientific Information
  • Science Citation Index. Journal citation reports
  • 1998