Immunological tolerance: Danger – pathogen on the premises!

@article{Janeway1996ImmunologicalTD,
  title={Immunological tolerance: Danger – pathogen on the premises!},
  author={Charles A. Jr Janeway and Christopher C. Goodnow and Ruslan Medzhitov},
  journal={Current Biology},
  year={1996},
  volume={6},
  pages={519-522}
}

Figures from this paper

An innate view of human pregnancy.

NKG2D–MICA Interaction: A Paradigm Shift in Innate Recognition

The way in which immune cells recognize their targets has long been a subject of intense research in the immunological community. The discovery of Abs and identification of the TCR attest to the

There is only one immune system! The view from immunopathology.

TLDR
In every response, whether positive or negative, the factors mobilized and the balance between protection and damage depend upon the quality, quantity, location, and timing of immunogen presentation, as well as upon properties of the host.

Immunosuppression without immunosuppression? How to be a tolerant individual in a dangerous world

  • A. Kirk
  • Medicine
    Transplant infectious disease : an official journal of the Transplantation Society
  • 1999
TLDR
An alternative approach to transplantation is reviewed that focuses on tissue injury as the instigator of graft rejection and employs physiological mechanisms of tolerance to avoid graft loss and the rationale behind the use of anti‐CD154 antibody treatment is highlighted.

Immunological self/nonself discrimination

The hypothesis is presented that immunological integration of nonefficacious vs efficacious T cell antigen receptor (TCR) signals are foundational for self/nonself discrimination and that multiple

Protective autoantibodies in the rheumatic diseases: lessons for therapy

TLDR
A class of naturally arising regulatory IgM autoantibodies to oxidation-associated neo-antigens enhance the capacity for the phagocytic clearance of host cells affected by programmed death pathways and suppress key signalling pathways in the innate immune system involved in the control and resolution of inflammatory responses.

The danger theory: 20 years later

TLDR
The danger theory vis-à-vis recent experimental data on innate immunity, transplantation, cancers and tolerance to foreign entities, and try to elucidate more clearly whether danger is well defined.

The damage-response framework of microbial pathogenesis

TLDR
A new theoretical approach to understanding microbial pathogenesis, known as the 'damage-response' framework, is proposed, which aims to address the impediment to studies of host–microorganism interactions.

Cutting Edge Commentary: A Copernican Revolution? Doubts About the Danger Theory1

  • R. Vance
  • Psychology
    The Journal of Immunology
  • 2000
TLDR
Given that the immune system has been cobbled together throughout evolution and uses a diverse array of innate and adaptive defense mechanisms, it may not be possible to account for immunity within one “paradigm” or another.
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 21 REFERENCES

Neonatal Tolerance Revisited: Turning on Newborn T Cells with Dendritic Cells

TLDR
Reexamination of the classic Neonatal tolerance experiments showed that tolerance is not an intrinsic property of the newborn immune system, but that the nature of the antigen-presenting cell determines whether the outcome is neonatal tolerance or immunization.

Tolerance, danger, and the extended family.

TLDR
The possibility that the immune system does not care about self and non-self, that its primary driving force is the need to detect and protect against danger, and that it does not do the job alone, but receives positive and negative communications from an extended network of other bodily tissues is discussed.

Induction of TH1 and TH2 Immunity in Neonatal Mice

TLDR
The classic system for induction of neonatal tolerance to protein antigens was reexamined in mice and the presumably tolerogenic protocol was found to trigger a vigorous T helper cell type 2 (TH2) immune response.

Induction of Protective CTL Responses in Newborn Mice by a Murine Retrovirus

TLDR
The inability of neonates to develop a CTL response to high doses of virus was not the result of immunological immaturity but correlated with the induction of a nonprotective type 2 cytokine response, suggesting the initial viral dose is critical in the development of protective immunity in newborns.

Balancing immunity and tolerance: deleting and tuning lymphocyte repertoires.

  • C. Goodnow
  • Biology
    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
  • 1996
TLDR
Self-reactive cells are retained with a variety of conditional and potentially flexible restraints, altering susceptibility to autoimmune disease and to infection by genetic or environmental differences either in the way antigens are presented, in the tuning molecules that adjust triggering set points for lymphocyte responses to antigen, or in the effector molecules that eliminate, retain, or expand particular clones.

‘Actively Acquired Tolerance’ of Foreign Cells

The experiments to be described in this article provide a solution—at present only a ‘laboratory’ solution—of the problem of how to make tissue homografts immunologically acceptable to hosts which

Does T-cell tolerance require a dedicated antigen-presenting cell?

TLDR
It is found that dendritic cells from spleen, which are the most potent activators of mature T cells are also the most powerful inactivators of young developing T cells, suggesting that it is not the antigen-presenting cell which determines whether a T-cell responds or dies, but the T- cell itself or its thymic environment.

A new analysis of allogeneic interactions.

TLDR
A model of cell interaction is produced which will account for reactivity is much higher between different strains within a species than between species, in spite of the much greater antigenic disparity in the second case, and a very high proportion of cells may respond to allogeneic stimuli.

A Theory of Self-Nonself Discrimination

TLDR
The foregoing requirements provide an explanation for self-nonself discrimination, which involves a specific deletion in the activity of both the humoral- and the carrier-antigen-sensitive cells.