• DOI:10.1080/09654313.2012.753993
• Corpus ID: 144522474

Imaginary Success?—The Contentious Ascendance of Creativity

@article{Campbell2014ImaginarySC,
  title={Imaginary Success?—The Contentious Ascendance of Creativity},
  author={Peter Odell Campbell},
  journal={European Planning Studies},
  year={2014},
  volume={22},
  pages={1009 - 995}
}

• P. Campbell
• Published 4 May 2014
• Sociology
• European Planning Studies

This paper posits that a set of “creative industries” centred around cultural practice have played a key role within a dominant “economic imaginary” in recent years. The success and stability of this role is considered, and a coherent position regarding the nature of creativity is outlined. Examination of the “evidence” gathering projects used to bulwark this position, however, reveals how the data which emerge from such projects may no longer appropriately serve to support the position the creative industries have come to occupy within the dominant imaginary. It is argued that this imaginary persists in providing a coherent framework for understanding and for action, however, regardless of the contradictions it contains. A tangible example of this “imaginary success” is briefly considered within the UK context, via an examination of developments around the staging of the European Capital of Culture programme in Liverpool, England in 2008. In this case, it is also argued that apparent contradictions are successfully concealed by dominant positions regarding culture and creativity. In conclusion, some explanations for this state of affairs are considered, and it is argued that the increased attention being paid to cultural creativity may render the continued concealment of these contradictions untenable.