Illusory conjunctions in the perception of objects

@article{Treisman1982IllusoryCI,
  title={Illusory conjunctions in the perception of objects},
  author={Anne Treisman and Hilary Schmidt},
  journal={Cognitive Psychology},
  year={1982},
  volume={14},
  pages={107-141}
}

Figures and Tables from this paper

Categorization influences illusory conjunctions
TLDR
This finding demonstrates that alphanumeric categorization can precede and subsequently influence binding and indicates that objects that are perceptually grouped are more likely to have their features erroneously conjoined.
Intrusions into the shadow of attention: A new take on illusory conjunctions
TLDR
It is proposed that attention to the digits casts an attentional ‘shadow’ projecting towards fixation, interfering with processing of target letters in that shadow and allowing color information from elsewhere in the display to be included in the resulting percept.
Is meaning implicated in illusory conjunctions?
  • R. Virzi, H. Egeth
  • Psychology
    Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance
  • 1984
TLDR
It appears that subjects extract semantic representations from input and are sometimes confused about whether a particular representation has been extracted from a word or a color patch, suggesting that illusory conjunctions may occur with high-level codes as well as with perceptual features.
Grouping does not require attention
TLDR
The results reinforce the idea that, although grouping outside the focus of attention cannot be the object of overt report, grouping processes can occur without attention.
The structure of illusory conjunctions reveals hierarchical binding of multipart objects
TLDR
The structure of pre-attentive representations of multipart, multicolor objects are studied by exploring the patterns of illusory conjunctions that arise outside the focus of attention, to suggest that representations outside thefocus of attention are not entirely a “shapeless bundles of features,” but preserve some meaningful object structure.
Illusory conjunctions are alive and well: a reply to Donk (1999).
TLDR
The authors demonstrate that although target-nontarget confusion errors are a potential source of conjunction reports, there is a plethora of findings that cannot be accounted for by this confusion model.
Conjunction of color and form without attention: evidence from an orientation-contingent color aftereffect.
  • M. Houck, J. Hoffman
  • Psychology
    Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance
  • 1986
TLDR
Color and shape appear to be conjoined preattentively, when perceptual aftereffects are used as the measure, and different experimental procedures may be tapping into different stages of preatTentive vision.
What Can Illusory Conjunctions Reveal About Synaesthetic Bindings?
TLDR
The findings strongly support the notion that shape and colour are free-floating features in synaesthesia, similar to what is observed in normal cognition.
Preattentive processing in vision
  • A. Treisman
  • Psychology
    Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process.
  • 1985
Illusory conjunctions and the cerebral hemispheres
TLDR
The results suggest that early preattentive processes of feature extraction are not lateralized, whereas some integrative mechanisms, such as Treisman’s (1988) focal attention, may operate differently in the two hemispheres.
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 27 REFERENCES
Focused attention in the perception and retrieval of multidimensional stimuli
This paper reports some further experiments on successive matching of multidimensional stimuli in which the correct conjunctions of features must be specified; it also modifies and extends the model
Perception of wholes and of their component parts: some configural superiority effects.
TLDR
Two patterns which differed only in a single part could be discriminated from each other more quickly than could their distinguishing parts shown in isolation, and the outlines of a model for preattentive feature discrimination are presented.
A feature-integration theory of attention
Attention and the metric structure of the stimulus space.
Stimules configuration in selective attention tasks
TLDR
The possibility that perceptual configuration of stimulus elements impairs the ability to attend selectively to individual elements was tested with two-element stimuli, constructed by placing two curved lines in close proximity, and it was concluded that these stimuli were perceived as unanalyzed, nominally related shapes.
Some characteristics of selective attention in visual perception determined by vocal reaction time
Previous research had found that the accuracy with which an S could report an indicated letter or target in a briefly exposed multiletter display decreased as the number of irrelevant letters
Attention and the measurement of perceptual learning
TLDR
The main findings were interpreted in terms of a model of perceptual processing which involves mechanisms for hierarchical coding, selective attention, and automatic processing.
Evidence for feature perturbations
TLDR
These experiments were carried out to test the notion of feature perturbations in a fairly direct fashion and showed that errors which resulted from items that were correctly identified but that were reported in an incorrect order were shown to be distinct from errors resulting from feature perturgations.
Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory.
Tested the 2-process theory of detection, search, and attention presented by the current authors (1977) in a series of experiments. The studies (a) demonstrate the qualitative difference between 2
Perception and Communication
Perception and CommunicationBy D. E. Broadbent. Pp. v + 338. (London and New York: Pergamon Press, 1958.) 55s. net.
...
...