If you could see what we see, would it bother you?

Abstract

The purpose of our study was to determine whether the anatomic threshold for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) diagnosis and surgical success remains valid when the patient sees what we see on exam. Two hundred participants were assigned, by computer-generated block randomization, to see one of four videos. Each video contained the same six clips representative of various degrees of anterior vaginal wall support. Participants were asked questions immediately after each clip. They were asked: “In your opinion, does this patient have a bulge or something falling out that she can see or feel in the vaginal area?” Similarly, they were asked to give their opinion on surgical outcome on a 4-point Likert scale. The proportion of participants who identified the presence of a vaginal bulge increased substantially at the level of early stage 2 prolapse (1 cm above the hymen), with 67 % answering yes to the question regarding bulge. The proportion of participants who felt that surgical outcome was less desirable also increased substantially at early stage 2 prolapse (1 cm above the hymen), with 52 % describing that outcome as “not at all” or “somewhat” successful. Early stage 2 POP (1 cm above the hymen) is the anatomic threshold at which women identify both a vaginal bulge and a less desirable surgical outcome when they see what we see on examination.

DOI: 10.1007/s00192-016-3073-x

6 Figures and Tables

Cite this paper

@article{Kassis2016IfYC, title={If you could see what we see, would it bother you?}, author={Nadine C. Kassis and Jennifer J. Hamner and Michelle Miki Takase-Sanchez and Waseem Khoder and Douglass Stuart Hale and M. Heit}, journal={International Urogynecology Journal}, year={2016}, volume={28}, pages={59-64} }