Identity fusion: the interplay of personal and social identities in extreme group behavior.

  title={Identity fusion: the interplay of personal and social identities in extreme group behavior.},
  author={William B. Swann and {\'A}ngel G{\'o}mez and Daniel Conor Seyle and Jos{\'e} Francisco Morales and Carmen Huici},
  journal={Journal of personality and social psychology},
  volume={96 5},
The authors propose that when people become fused with a group, their personal and social identities become functionally equivalent. Two hypotheses follow from this proposition. First, activating either personal or social identities of fused persons should increase their willingness to endorse extreme behaviors on behalf of the group. Second, because personal as well as social identities support group-related behaviors of fused persons, the 2 forms of identity may combine synergistically… 
Identity Fusion
Identity fusion is a visceral sense of “oneness” with a group and its individual members that motivates personally costly, pro-group behaviors. Past approaches, most notably social identity theory,
When group membership gets personal: a theory of identity fusion.
Possible causes of identity fusion--ranging from relatively distal, evolutionary, and cultural influences to more proximal, contextual influences--are discussed and possible effects on pro-group actions are mediated by perceptions of arousal and invulnerability.
Testing the identity synergy principle: Identity fusion promotes self and group sacrifice
Abstract The social-categorization framework views the salience of personal and social identity as functionally antagonistic such that activation of one entails muting the other. Identity fusion
Previous research demonstrated that group adherence, which manifests itself by personal and social identity fusion, is related to radical pro-group attitudes and that this relationship is stronger
Exploring the Pathways Between Transformative Group Experiences and Identity Fusion
This pre-registered study examines the role of transformativeness and perceived sharedness of group-defining events in generating identity fusion and finds that both of these factors are predictive of identity fusion but that the relationship withtransformativeness was more consistent than perceivedsharedness across analyses in a sample of Indonesian Muslims.
Identity Fusion, Extreme Pro‐Group Behavior, and the Path to Defusion
Identityfusionreferstoa visceralsense of onenesswithan ingroup. For fused individuals,group membership is not a means to an end (e.g.,a positive social identity). Rather, membership is an
The evolution of strongly-held group identities through agent-based cooperation
The study provides clues, beyond qualitative and observational studies, as to how hypocrisy may have established itself to reinforce the collective benefit of a fused group identity, and provides an alternative perspective on the controversial proposition of group selection.
The Interplay of Personal and Social Identity
Personal and social identity have generally been considered as separate components of individual’s self-concept. In this review, after addressing classical models of personal and social identity, we
Why do people self-sacrifice for their country? The roles of identity fusion and empathic concern.
The results supported the model that relates variables not previously explored jointly and discussed the theoretical implications of the model, especially the relationship of identity fusion with empathic concern and personal distress-traditional explanations for pro-group behavior-considering the different motivations associated to both emotional reactions.
Identity Fusion: Reciprocal Activation and Motivational Primacy of Selves
Identity fusion theory suggests that for strong group connections identity-synergy occurs between personal and collective-selves such that activation of one activates the other (Swann & Buhrmester,


When I equals we: exploring the relation between social and personal identity of extreme right-wing political party members.
Results suggest that members of this groups show no signs of 'vanishing individuality': although boundaries between personal and social identities are blurred, extremist group members retain a distinct and strengthened sense of personal identity.
The Social Self: On Being the Same and Different at the Same Time
Mfost of social psychology's theories of the self fail to take into account the significance of social identification in the definition of self. Social identities are self-definitions that are more
Relationship between social and personal identities: Segregation or integration.
Recognition that self-representation includes both social and personal identities raises questions about the cognitive organization of these elements. Two models of identity structure are compared:
A Collective Self-Esteem Scale: Self-Evaluation of One's Social Identity
Social identity theory as developed by Tajfel and Turner argues that there are two distinct aspects of the self-concept: personal identity and social identity (in American terminology, collective
Individuality and the Group: Advances in Social Identity
Social identity research has transformed psychology and the social sciences. Developed around intergroup relations, perspectives on social identity have now been applied fruitfully to a diverse array
An In-Group Becomes Part of the Self: Response Time Evidence
Social identity theory holds that social group memberships become part of the psychological self; affecting thoughts, feelings, and behavior. However, tests of this hypothesis to date have mainly
Comments on the motivational status of self-esteem in social identity and intergroup discrimination
The background and development of motivational hypotheses in social identity theory are examined, revealing two general motives for intergroup discrimination: a desire for cognitive coherence, or
Self and Collective: Cognition and Social Context
The relationship between the self and the collective is discussed from the perspective of self-categorization theory. Self-categorization theory makes a basic distinction between personal and social
Social Attraction, Personal Attraction, and Self-Categorization-, A Field Study
A distinction based on social identity theory and self-categorization theory is made between depersonalized (i.e., group prototypical, stereotypical) social attraction and idiosyncratic personal
Social Self-Regulation
The social identity and self-awareness approaches to group members' behavior are described. It is suggested that identity salience should not be assumed to have direct effects on behavior. A model is