Identifying Reading Disabilities by Responsiveness-to-Instruction: Specifying Measures and Criteria

@article{Fuchs2004IdentifyingRD,
  title={Identifying Reading Disabilities by Responsiveness-to-Instruction: Specifying Measures and Criteria},
  author={Douglas Fuchs and Lynn S. Fuchs and Donald L. Compton},
  journal={Learning Disability Quarterly},
  year={2004},
  volume={27},
  pages={216 - 227}
}
First, we describe two types of assessment (problem solving and standard treatment protocol) within a “responsiveness-to-instruction” framework to identify learning disabilities. We then specify two necessary components (measures and classification criteria) to assess responsiveness-to-instruction, and present pertinent findings from two related studies. These studies involve databases at grades 1 and 2, which were analyzed to compare the soundness of alternative methods of assessing… Expand

Figures from this paper

Are Individual Differences in Response to Intervention Influenced by the Methods and Measures Used to Define Response? Implications for Identifying Children With Learning Disabilities
TLDR
Findings indicated students with higher pretreatment scores on expressive vocabulary, nonverbal IQ, teacher ratings of attention, and reading comprehension measures were more likely classified as responsive with final status methods, suggesting “response” is strongly context dependent. Expand
Early Response-to-Intervention Measures and Criteria as Predictors of Reading Disability in 3rd Grade
Reading is the most valuable skill children must master early in schooling. Unfortunately, many students struggle to read and may be identified as having a Reading Disability (RD). In thisExpand
Predictors of Responsiveness to Early Literacy Intervention
The purpose of this review was to update previous reviews on factors related to students’ responsiveness to early literacy intervention. The 14 studies in this synthesis used experimental designs,Expand
Early Response-to-Intervention Measures and Criteria as Predictors of Reading Disability in the Beginning of Third Grade
TLDR
The usefulness of first and second grade reading measures and responsiveness criteria collected within a response-to-intervention (RtI) framework for predicting reading disability (RD) in third grade is explored and the former finding is promising for early identification of students in need of more intensive instruction in lexical or fluency-based skills. Expand
Identification of Reading Problems in First Grade Within a Response-to-Intervention Framework
TLDR
This study examined accuracy, fluency, growth, and teacher rating measures as predictors of child status (at risk, not at risk) at the end of the school year based on an unselected sample of 243 children and selected the prediction model that best fit the selection criteria. Expand
Determining English Language Learners' Response to Intervention: Questions and Some Answers
Using an extant database, we examined three grade 1 criteria for identifying response to intervention (RTI) in English language learners (ELLs): (a) set benchmark criteria with a standard score aboveExpand
New Probes for Early Literacy Skills
TLDR
Results provide evidence that the Reading Fluency and Maze Sentences tasks are as reliable and valid as other measures in current use for screening, but suggest that they are not sensitive to students' growth over time. Expand
Incorporating RTI in a Hybrid Model of Reading Disability
TLDR
A hybrid model of identification that incorporates response to instruction and intervention (RTI) as one of the key symptoms of reading disability is evaluated, which confirmed previous findings of limited stability for single-criterion-based operational definitions ofReading disability. Expand
Determining Responsiveness to Tier 2 Intervention in Response to Intervention: Level of Performance, Growth, or Both
This response to intervention study examined agreement between classification methods of preschool children’s responsiveness to Tier 2 intervention using level of performance (25th percentile),Expand
DIFFERENTIATING AMONG STUDENTS: THE VALUE ADDED OF A DYNAMIC ASSESSMENT OF MORPHOLOGICAL PROBLEM-SOLVING
In this study, a dynamic assessment was used to measure the morphological analysis skills of participating sixth graders. The primary aim of this research was to examine the utility of this dynamicExpand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 54 REFERENCES
Responsiveness‐to‐Intervention: Definitions, Evidence, and Implications for the Learning Disabilities Construct
Longstanding concern about how learning disabilities (LD) are defined and identified, coupled with recent efforts in Washington, DC to eliminate IQ-achievement discrepancy as an LD marker, have ledExpand
Response to Instruction as a Means of Identifying Students with Reading/Learning Disabilities
To examine a response to treatment model as a means for identifying students with reading/learning disabilities, 45 second-grade students at risk for reading problems were provided daily supplementalExpand
Redefining Learning Disabilities as Inadequate Response to Instruction: The Promise and Potential Problems
In this introduction to the special issue, a response-to-instruction approach to learning disabilities (LD) identification is discussed. Then, an overview of the promise and the potential pitfalls ofExpand
Treatment Validity as a Unifying Construct for Identifying Learning Disabilities
The purpose of this article is to revisit the issue of treatment validity as a framework for identifying learning disabilities. In 1995, an eligibility assessment process, rooted within a treatmentExpand
Classification in Context: An Alternative Approach to Identifying Early Reading Disability.
This study evaluated an alternative method of identifying early reading difficulty. L. S. Fuchs and D. Fuchs (1998) proposed that academic problems could be indexed by a dual discrepancy on level andExpand
Cognitive profiles of reading disability: Comparisons of discrepancy and low achievement definitions.
To examine the validity of distinguishing children with reading disabilities according to discrepancy and low-achievement definitions, we obtained four assessments of expected reading achievement andExpand
Critical Measurement Issues in Learning Disabilities
For many years (Chalfant & Scheffelin, 1969), but particularly since the passage of Public Law 94-142 (Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975), the diagnosis and evaluation of learningExpand
Responding to Nonresponders: An Experimental Field Trial of Identification and Intervention Methods
First graders (N = 323) participated in an evidence-based classwide reading program (Peer-Assisted Learning Strategies; PALS). Adual-discrepancy approach was used to identify 56 children whoseExpand
Cognitive profiles of difficult-to-remediate and readily remediated poor readers : Early intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between cognitive and experiential deficits as basic causes of specific Reading disability
Reading impaired first graders were given daily tutoring as a first cut diagnostic to aid in distinguishing between reading difficulties caused by basic cognitive deficits and those caused byExpand
IQ Is Irrelevant to the Definition of Learning Disabilities
  • L. Siegel
  • Psychology, Medicine
  • Journal of learning disabilities
  • 1989
TLDR
The logic and empirical data supporting the proposition that intelligence tests are not necessary for the definition of a learning disability were examined and empirical evidence was presented that poor readers at a variety of IQ levels show similar reading, spelling, language, and memory deficits. Expand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...