Ibn al-Haytham (965–1039 AD), the original portrayal of the modern theory of vision

  title={Ibn al-Haytham (965–1039 AD), the original portrayal of the modern theory of vision},
  author={B. Daneshfard and B. Dalfardi and Golnoush Sadat Mahmoudi Nezhad},
  journal={Journal of Medical Biography},
  pages={227 - 231}
Abū ՙAlī al-Ḥasan ibn al-Ḥasan ibn al-Haytham, known in the West as Alhazen, was an Arab-Islamic scholar who helped develop the science of ophthalmology during the medieval era. He was the first to reject firmly the extramission theory of vision, which was prevalent during his time, and suggested that the eyes are the source of the light rays responsible for vision. Ibn al-Haytham in his book entitled Kitab al-Manazir (Book of Optics) explained vision based on light emanating from objects. In… Expand
5 Citations
An untold story: The important contributions of Muslim scholars for the understanding of human anatomy
  • 6
  • Highly Influenced
  • PDF
Ocular anatomy in medieval arabic medicine. A review.
Ruggero Bortolami (1926-2014): in memoriam.
  • E. Manni
  • Medicine, Biology
  • Italian journal of anatomy and embryology = Archivio italiano di anatomia ed embriologia
  • 2016
Visual Neuroscience: The Puzzle of Perceptual Stability
  • 5


Ibn al-Haitham--father of optics and describer of vision theory.
  • I. Masic
  • Psychology, Medicine
  • Medicinski arhiv
  • 2008
  • 3
  • Highly Influential
Ibn Al-Haytham: Father of Modern Optics
  • 8
  • Highly Influential
  • PDF
Ibn Al‐Haytham (Alhazen)
  • 2
Al-Akhawayni, a contributor to medieval Persian knowledge on contraception
  • 13
How Islam changed medicine: Ibn al-Haytham and optics
  • 6
  • Highly Influential
Ibn Al-Haytham and Psychophysics
  • 7
  • Highly Influential
Theories of vision from Al-Kindi to Kepler
  • 369
  • Highly Influential
Encyclopaedia of the History of Science, Technology, and Medicine in Non-Western Cultures
  • 165
  • Highly Influential
  • PDF
Historical background.
  • M. Epstein
  • Medicine
  • Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences
  • 2001
  • 346