"I Wanted to Predict Elections with Twitter and all I got was this Lousy Paper" - A Balanced Survey on Election Prediction using Twitter Data

Abstract

Predicting X from Twitter is a popular fad within the Twitter research subculture. It seems both appealing and relatively easy. Among such kind of studies, electoral prediction is maybe the most attractive, and at this moment there is a growing body of literature on such a topic. This is not only an interesting research problem but, above all, it is extremely difficult. However, most of the authors seem to be more interested in claiming positive results than in providing sound and reproducible methods. It is also especially worrisome that many recent papers seem to only acknowledge those studies supporting the idea of Twitter predicting elections , instead of conducting a balanced literature review showing both sides of the matter. After reading many of such papers I have decided to write such a survey myself. Hence, in this paper, every study relevant to the matter of electoral prediction using social media is commented. From this review it can be concluded that the predictive power of Twitter regarding elections has been greatly exaggerated, and that hard research problems still lie ahead.

Showing 1-10 of 25 references

Where there is a sea there are pirates: Response to jungherr, jürgens, and schoen

  • Andranik Tumasjan, O Timm, Philipp G Sprenger, Isabell M Sandner, Welpe
  • 2011
Highly Influential
10 Excerpts

Carolyn Whitlock, and Panagiotis Takis Metaxas. Vocal minority versus silent majority: Discovering the opionions of the long tail

  • Eni Mustafaraj, Samantha Finn
  • 2011
1 Excerpt
Showing 1-10 of 50 extracted citations

Statistics

0102030201220132014201520162017
Citations per Year

81 Citations

Semantic Scholar estimates that this publication has received between 53 and 129 citations based on the available data.

See our FAQ for additional information.