• DOI:10.1006/JESP.1998.1364
• Corpus ID: 18571144

Hypothesis-consistent testing and semantic priming in the anchoring paradigm: A selective accessibility model.

@article{Mussweiler1999HypothesisconsistentTA,
  title={Hypothesis-consistent testing and semantic priming in the anchoring paradigm: A selective accessibility model.},
  author={Thomas Mussweiler and Fritz Strack},
  journal={Journal of Experimental Social Psychology},
  year={1999},
  volume={35},
  pages={136-164}
}

• T. Mussweiler, F. Strack
• Published 1 March 1999
• Psychology
• Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

Results of four studies support the notion that anchoring effects are mediated by mechanisms of hypothesis-consistent testing and semantic priming. According to the suggested Selective Accessibility Model, judges use a hypothesis-consistent test strategy to solve a comparative anchoring task. Applying this strategy selectively increases the accessibility of anchor-consistent knowledge which is then used to generate the subsequent absolute judgment. Studies 1 and 2 demonstrate that absolute estimates depend on the hypothesis implied in the comparative task, suggesting that a hypothesis-testing strategy is used to solve this task. Study 3 shows that limiting the amount of knowledge generated for the comparative task retards absolute judgments. This suggests that knowledge rendered easily accessible in the comparative judgment is used for the subsequent absolute judgment. Finally, Study 4 suggests that self-generation of knowledge contributes to the robustness of the effect, thus resolving the seeming inconsistency that anchoring effects are at the same time remarkably robust and mediated by typically fragile semantic priming mechanisms.