Hypnotic control of attention in the Stroop task: A historical footnote

@article{Macleod2003HypnoticCO,
  title={Hypnotic control of attention in the Stroop task: A historical footnote},
  author={Colin M. Macleod and P. Sheehan},
  journal={Consciousness and Cognition},
  year={2003},
  volume={12},
  pages={347-353}
}
Raz, Shapiro, Fan, and Posner (2002) have recently provided a compelling demonstration of enhanced attentional control under post-hypnotic suggestion. Using the classic color-word interference paradigm, in which the task is to ignore a word and to name the color in which it is printed (e.g., RED in green, say "green"), they gave a post-hypnotic instruction to participants that they would be unable to read. This eliminated Stroop interference in high suggestibility participants but did not alter… Expand

Tables and Topics from this paper

Hypnosis and the control of attention: Where to from here?
TLDR
Overriding a highly practiced, possibly even automatic response like reading is testament to the attentional control that can be exerted under (post)hypnotic suggestion, to obtain a clear picture of how suggestion can orchestrate attention. Expand
A brief review of three manipulations of the Stroop task focusing on the automaticity of semantic access
Since Stroop (1935), semantic access has been seen as automatic but today this is questioned, following minor modifications of the Stroop task. Besner, Stolz and Boutilier (1997) showed that coloringExpand
Posthypnotic suggestion and the modulation of Stroop interference under cycloplegia
TLDR
The view that Stroop interference is neither robust nor inevitable is strengthened and the hypothesis that posthypnotic suggestion may exert a top-down influence on neural processing is supported. Expand
Suggestion does not de-automatize word reading: Evidence from the semantically based Stroop task
Recent studies have shown that the suggestion for participants to construe words as meaningless symbols reduces, or even eliminates, standard Stroop interference in highly suggestible individualsExpand
Hypnotic Ability and Baseline Attention: fMRI Findings From Stroop Interference
A benchmark experimental conflict task, the Stroop interference effect, probes selective attention. Regarding individual differences, accounts from multiple independent research groups have shownExpand
Suggestion overrides the Stroop effect in highly hypnotizable individuals
TLDR
It is shown that suggestion administered to highly hypnotizable persons significantly reduced Stroop interference and derailed a seemingly automatic process. Expand
Investigating trial types putatively evidencing semantic conflict in the Stroop task
Interference in the Stroop task is thought to arise from various stages of processing, including the semantic and response stages. Different experimental methods have been used in an attempt toExpand
Can suggestion obviate reading? Supplementing primary Stroop evidence with exploratory negative priming analyses
TLDR
Findings indicate that suggestion reduces Stroop effects in HSIs, and suggestion seems to dampen a deeply-engrained and largely automatic process - reading - by wielding a larger influence on HSIs relative to comparable LSIs. Expand
Using suggestion to modulate automatic processes: From Stroop to McGurk and beyond
TLDR
It is demonstrated how, in the case of highly suggestible individuals, suggestion seems to wield control over a process that is likely even more automatic than the Stroop effect, i.e., transforming, without practice, a controlled task into one that is automatic. Expand
An investigation of individual differences in diffusion of attention and the attentional blink
When identifying two targets in rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP), accuracy on the second target is reduced if presented shortly after the first target -an attentional blink (AB). SomeExpand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 20 REFERENCES
Strategy manipulation and the Stroop effect in hypnosis.
Interdimensional interference in the Stroop effect: uncovering the cognitive and neural anatomy of attention
TLDR
A sketch of the behavioral phenomenon is presented, focusing on the idea that the relative automaticity of the two dimensions determines the direction and the degree of interdimensional interference between them, and how existing interference data are captured by models. Expand
Posthypnotic suggestion and the modulation of Stroop interference under cycloplegia
TLDR
The view that Stroop interference is neither robust nor inevitable is strengthened and the hypothesis that posthypnotic suggestion may exert a top-down influence on neural processing is supported. Expand
Hypnotic suggestion and the modulation of Stroop interference.
TLDR
The outcome of this study challenges the dominant view that word recognition is obligatory for proficient readers, and may provide insight into top-down influences of suggestion on cognition. Expand
Effects of Hypnotizability on Performance of a Stroop Task and Event-Related Potentials
TLDR
There was a marked deterioration in performance accuracy, however, for highly hypnotizable subjects during hypnosis, suggesting a lack of orienting to or disengagement from peripherally occurring stimuli. Expand
Hypnotic susceptibility and verbal automaticity: automatic and strategic processing differences in the Stroop color-naming task.
The original hypothesis of Dixon, Brunet, and Laurence (1990) that highly hypnotizable (HH) subjects process words more automatically than do low hypnotizable (LH) subjects was retested in a paradigmExpand
Training on integrated versus separated Stroop tasks: The progression of interference and facilitation
TLDR
The findings imply that Stroop interference initially reflects two problems—overcoming integration and managing two conflicting information sources; with practice, the larger integration problem is solved relatively quickly, rendering the integrated and separated tasks quite comparable thereafter; and facilitation and interference in the Stroop task may be independent. Expand
Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review.
TLDR
It is concluded that recent theories placing the explanatory weight on parallel processing of the irrelevant and the relevant dimensions are likely to be more sucessful than are earlier theories attempting to locate a single bottleneck in attention. Expand
Hypnotizability and automaticity: toward a parallel distributed processing model of hypnotic responding.
TLDR
Findings support the contention that highly hypnotizable persons have stronger verbal connection strengths than their moderately and low susceptible counterparts, and they may account for highly hypnotisable persons' propensity to disregard personal attributions and label their responses in hypnosis as being involuntary. Expand
Training and Stroop-like interference: evidence for a continuum of automaticity.
TLDR
The overall pattern is inconsistent with a simple speed of processing account of interference and the alternative idea of a continuum of automaticity--a direct consequence of training--remains plausible, and the implications of this perspective are considered. Expand
...
1
2
...