Hypnotic Disgust Makes Moral Judgments More Severe

@article{Wheatley2005HypnoticDM,
  title={Hypnotic Disgust Makes Moral Judgments More Severe},
  author={Thalia Wheatley and Jonathan Haidt},
  journal={Psychological Science},
  year={2005},
  volume={16},
  pages={780 - 784}
}
Highly hypnotizable participants were given a posthypnotic suggestion to feel a flash of disgust whenever they read an arbitrary word. They were then asked to rate moral transgressions described in vignettes that either did or did not include the disgust-inducing word. Two studies show that moral judgments can be made more severe by the presence of a flash of disgust. These findings suggest that moral judgments may be grounded in affectively laden moral intuitions. 

Tables from this paper

Disgust as Embodied Moral Judgment
TLDR
Experiments 2-4 showed that the role of disgust in severity of moral judgments depends on participants' sensitivity to their own bodily sensations, indicating the importance—and specificity—of gut feelings in moral judgments.
On Disgust and Moral Judgments: A Review
While there is a continuing debate on whether cognitive or emotional mechanisms underlie moral judgments, recent studies have illustrated that emotions—particularly disgust—play a prominent role in
The Effects of Disgust on Moral Judgments
There is evidence that inducing feelings of disgust increases the severity of moral judgments, but the size of this association has been questioned by a recent meta-analysis. Based on prior research
[Dispositional mindfulness modulates automatic transference of disgust into moral judgment].
TLDR
It is suggested that being present prevents automatic transference of disgust into moral judgment even when prepotent emotions elicited by the thought of killing one person to save several others and utilitarian reasoning conflict.
Does Disgust Influence Moral Judgment?
Recent empirical research seems to show that emotions play a substantial role in moral judgment. Perhaps the most important line of support for this claim focuses on disgust. A number of philosophers
Moral judgment modulation by disgust is bi-directionally moderated by individual sensitivity
TLDR
It is found that individual change in moral acceptability ratings due to disgust priming was modulated by individual sensitivity to disgust, revealing a bi-directional function.
With a Clean Conscience
TLDR
The findings support the idea that moral judgment can be driven by intuitive processes, rather than deliberate reasoning, and one of those intuitions appears to be physical purity, because it has a strong connection to moral purity.
On Disgust and Moral Judgment
Despite the wealth of recent work implicating disgust as an emotion central to human morality, the nature of the causal relationship between disgust and moral judgment remains unclear. We distinguish
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 18 REFERENCES
Hypnotically induced emotional numbing
  • R. Bryant, May Kourch
  • Psychology
    The International journal of clinical and experimental hypnosis
  • 2001
TLDR
It is suggested that hypnotic emotional numbing may be a useful paradigm in which to explore processes in emotion inhibition.
Hypnotic suggestion and the modulation of Stroop interference.
TLDR
The outcome of this study challenges the dominant view that word recognition is obligatory for proficient readers, and may provide insight into top-down influences of suggestion on cognition.
Specific autobiographical memory following hypnotically induced mood state
TLDR
Findings suggest that impaired recall of specific memories may be mediated by state factors associated with sad mood, and point to the utility of hypnotic mood induction as a means to experimentally investigate the relationship between mood and autobiographical memory.
The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgment.
  • J. Haidt
  • Psychology
    Psychological review
  • 2001
TLDR
The author gives 4 reasons for considering the hypothesis that moral reasoning does not cause moral judgment; rather, moral reasoning is usually a post hoc construction, generated after a judgment has been reached.
Selectivity of Learning Caused by Affective States
We investigated how emotional states influence learning and memory. Specifically, we asked whether people's remembering of a text varies with their emotional mood at the time they read or recall a
Cognitive, social, and physiological determinants of emotional state.
The problem of which cues, internal or external, permit a person to label and identify his own emotional state has been with us since the days that James (1890) first tendered his doctrine that "the
Descartes' Error: Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain
TLDR
Brain books are similarly popular: humans are considered from a pathological/laboratory perspective and computer metaphors abound (your mind is your software!) and there are boxes and arrows in profusion.
Some evidence for heightened sexual attraction under conditions of high anxiety.
TLDR
Male passersby were contacted by an attractive female interviewer who asked them to fill out questionnaires containing Thematic Apperception Test pictures, and sexual content of stories written by subjects on the fear-arousing bridge and tendency of these subjects to attempt postexperimental contact with the interviewer were both significantly greater.
Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: Informative and directive functions of affective states.
Les auteurs cherchent a savoir si l'humeur dans lequel le sujet se trouve au moment ou on lui demande d'evaluer sa satisfaction existentielle, influence precisement ces evaluations
Hypnotic visual illusion alters color processing in the brain.
TLDR
Observed changes in subjective experience achieved during hypnosis were reflected by changes in brain function similar to those that occur in perception, supporting the claim that hypnosis is a psychological state with distinct neural correlates and is not just the result of adopting a role.
...
...