Hypermedia Support for Argumentation-Based Rationale

  title={Hypermedia Support for Argumentation-Based Rationale},
  author={Simon Buckingham Shum and Albert M. Selvin and Maarten Sierhuis and Jeff Conklin and Charles B. Haley and Bashar Nuseibeh},
Having developed, used and evaluated some of the early IBIS-based approaches to design rationale (DR) such as gIBIS and QOC in the late 1980s/mid-1990s, we describe the subsequent evolution of the argumentation-based paradigm through software support, and perspectives drawn from modeling and meeting facilitation. Particular attention is given to the challenge of negotiating the overheads of capturing this form of rationale. Our approach has maintained a strong emphasis on keeping the… 

A reuse oriented representation model for capturing and formalizing the evolving design rationale

  • Jihong LiuX. Hu
  • Computer Science
    Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing
  • 2013
The paper provides an effective method to retain and manage a designer's implicit design knowledge, which has the potential to significantly improve the integrated management of product development knowledge.

RationalGRL: A framework for argumentation and goal modeling

This paper combines a simplified version of a traditional goal model, the Goal-oriented Requirements Language (GRL), with ideas from argumentation on schemes for practical reasoning into a new framework, RationalGRL, which provides a formal semantics and tool support to capture the discussions and outcomes of the argumentation process that leads to a goal model.

SAM: Semantic Argumentation Based Model for Collaborative Knowledge Creation and Sharing System

Semantic Argumentation based Model (SAM), which can fulfill the identified requirements and serve as a solid foundation for such a system, is developed and constructed for formally and semantically capturing and describing the community deliberation.

Enabling Intelligence in Web-Based Collaborative Knowledge Management System

The proposed approach applies the two widely-used argumentation technologies, namely IBIS and Toulmin's argumentation schemes, to structurally capture the deliberation and collaboration occurred during the consensual knowledge creation process.

RIDAL - A Language for Research Information Definition Argumentation

This paper aims to support existing RI standardisation initatives with a flexible and scalable way of documenting and communicating the standardisation process in order to increase acceptance for the resulting definitions.

Computer-supported argumentation: A review of the state of the art

This paper reviews the extensive literature on argumentation systems, both individual and collaborative, and both supportive and educational, with an eye toward particular aspects of the past work, and summarizes the “lessons learned” from this large and impressive body of work.

Analyzing Community Deliberation and Achieving Consensual Knowledge in SAM

A novel approach to harnessing collective intelligence that will allow a community to create, collaborate, and share knowledge based on the Semantic Argumentation Model SAM is presented and a web-based prototype system founded on the proposed approach is developed and made available for public use.

Comparing and Integrating Argumentation-Based with Matrix-Based Decision Support in Arg&Dec

The recently introduced QuAD frameworks, based on the IBIS model and quantitative argumentation, and the decision matrix method are investigated, and Arg&Dec (standing for Argue & Decide), a prototype web application for collaborative decision-making, is described.

RationalGRL: A Framework for Rationalizing Goal Models Using Argument Diagrams

The RationalGRL framework is developed, in which argument diagrams can be mapped to goal models and the result of the evaluation of arguments and their counterarguments with GRL initial satisfaction values are integrated.

Using Argumentative, Semantic Grammar for Capture of Design Rationale

The ASGARD (Argumentative, Semantic Grammar for Analysis of Rationale for Design) software uses an argumentative, semantic grammar to extract structured DR from transcripts of collaborative architectural design to show promise for automating DR capture.



Analyzing the Usability of a Design Rationale Notation

This chapter examines how designers use a DR notation during design problem solving, and compares the account of the QOC–design relationship which emerges from these studies, with reports of other DR approaches in use.

Argumentation-based design rationale: what use at what cost?

This analysis of argumentation research sets an agenda for future work driven by a concern to support the designer in the whole process of externalizing and structuring DR, from initially ill-formed ideas to more rigorous, coherent argumentation.

Making Argumentation Serve Design

The evolution of conceptual frameworks and systems toward integrated design environments is presented; a prototype of an integrated design environment, including its underlying architecture, is described; and some current and future work on extending it is discussed.

Graphical Argumentation and Design Cognition

This article presents a use-oriented analysis of a graphical argumentation notation known as QOC (Questions, Options, and Criteria), and shows that it provides most support when elaborating poorly understood design spaces, but is a distraction when evaluating well-constrained design spaces.

Supporting Collaborative Analysis and Design with Hypertext Functionality

Conversational Modeling is reported on, a technique that has been used successfully in a number of collaborative systems analysis, requirements gathering and work process redesign projects in a telecommunications company, and appears to be due to the combination of hypertext functionality, a structured modeling framework, and group facilitation strategies.

Rapid knowledge construction: a case study in corporate contingency planning using collaborative hypermedia

The Compendium approach, which has been applied in projects in both industry and academic settings, facilitates the rapid creation of the content of a KM repository, by combining collaborative hypermedia, group facilitation techniques, and an analytical methodology rooted in knowledge acquisition and structured analysis.

A Process-Oriented Approach to Design Rationale

We propose an approach to design rationale (DR) that emphasizes supporting the design process in such a way that a trace of the rationale is captured with little disruption of the normal process. We

Fostering Collective Intelligence: Helping Groups Use Visualized Argumentation

  • A. Selvin
  • Psychology
    Visualizing Argumentation
  • 2003
This chapter discusses lessons learned from applying visualized argumentation in realtime, face-to-face group settings, particularly on the role played by a facilitator - a person charged with managing both the creation and maintenance of the representation as well as the interaction of the group with it, and with each other and with the task at hand.

IBIS—a convincing concept…but a lousy instrument?

It is shown that most of the difficulties experienced in implementing IBIS are caused by the nature of planning and design problems and cannot be addressed by further improvement of computer support, however, awareness of these difficulties can help in handling them and thus increase acceptance of IBIS-like systems.

Formality Considered Harmful: Experiences, Emerging Themes, and Directions on the Use of Formal Representations in Interactive Systems

It is posed that, while it is impossible to remove all formalisms from computing systems, system designers need to match the level of formal expression entailed with the goals and situation of the users -- a design criteria not commonly mentioned in current interface design.