Hypercorrection of high confidence errors: Prior testing both enhances delayed performance and blocks the return of the errors

  title={Hypercorrection of high confidence errors: Prior testing both enhances delayed performance and blocks the return of the errors},
  author={Janet Metcalfe and David B. Miele},
  journal={Journal of applied research in memory and cognition},
  • J. MetcalfeD. Miele
  • Published 1 September 2014
  • Psychology
  • Journal of applied research in memory and cognition

Figures and Tables from this paper

Hypercorrection of high-confidence errors in the classroom

A significant hypercorrection effect is revealed, along with a tendency for students with higher prior knowledge of the material to express higher confidence in, and in turn more effective correction of, their error responses.

Learning from Errors

Experimental investigations indicate that errorful learning followed by corrective feedback is beneficial to learning, and the beneficial effects are particularly salient when individuals strongly believe that their error is correct.

Memory and truth: correcting errors with true feedback versus overwriting correct answers with errors

The results indicate that people have some kind of privileged access to whether their answers are right or wrong, above and beyond their confidence ratings, and that they behave differently when trying to remember new “corrective” information depending upon whether they, themselves, were right orwrong initially.

The role of recalling previous errors in middle-school children's learning.

Preadolescents' memory for errors is very limited, their ability to recall past errors predicts error correction overall, and recalling an error or being reminded of an error does not facilitate error correction.

On Teaching Old Dogs New Tricks

Although older adults rarely outperform young adults on learning tasks, in the study reported here they surpassed their younger counterparts not only by answering more semantic-memory

Metacognitive monitoring and the hypercorrection effect in autism and the general population: Relation to autism(-like) traits and mindreading

It is found that a representative sample of neurotypical participants made accurate confidence judgements (reflecting good metacognition) and showed the hypercorrection effect, and Mindreading ability was associated with autism spectrum disorder–like traits and metac Cognition, however, the hyperCorrection effect was non-significantly associated with mindreading or Autism spectrum disorder-like traits.



The hypercorrection effect persists over a week, but high-confidence errors return

Findings help to contextualize the hypercorrection effect within the broader memory literature by showing that high-confidence errors are more likely to be corrected, but they are also morelikely to be reproduced if the correct answer is forgotten.

The correction of errors committed with high confidence

Most theories predict that when people indicate that they are highly confident they are producing their strongest responses. Hence, if such a high confidence response is in error it should be

People's hypercorrection of high-confidence errors: did they know it all along?

  • J. MetcalfeB. Finn
  • Psychology
    Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition
  • 2011
This study investigated the "knew it all along" explanation of the hypercorrection effect, and found that when people said that they knew it allAlong, they were right.

Errors committed with high confidence are hypercorrected.

The relation between people's confidence in the accuracy of an erroneous response and their later performance was investigated and it was found that highly confident errors were the most likely to be corrected in a subsequent retest.

Correcting a metacognitive error: feedback increases retention of low-confidence correct responses.

It is shown that when correct responses are made with low confidence, feedback serves to correct this initial metacognitive error, enhancing retention of low-confidence correct responses.

The hypercorrection effect in younger and older adults

Older adults, despite higher overall accuracy on the general-information questions and excellent basic metacognitive ability, showed a diminished hypercorrection effect, showing, for the first time, that a particular participant population is selectively impaired on this error correction task.

Neural Correlates of People's Hypercorrection of Their False Beliefs

This experiment, which is the first to use imaging to investigate the hypercorrection effect, provided support for this hypothesis, showing that both metacognitive mismatch conditions—that in which high confidence accompanies a wrong answer and that in which lowconfidence accompanies a correct answer—revealed anterior cingulate and medial frontal gyrus activations.

Prior knowledge is more predictive of error correction than subjective confidence

The results suggest that prior knowledge likely plays a primary role in error correction, while confidence may play a small role or merely serve as a proxy for prior knowledge.

Surprising feedback improves later memory

Overall, participants better remembered both the surface features and the content of surprising feedback in the hypercorrection effect, which results from increased attention to surprising feedback.