Human vs robotic organ retraction during laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication

Abstract

Background: Advances in technique and instrumentation have enabled surgeons to perform an increasing number of complicated procedures through laparoscopy. However, these efforts have often been compromised by the exertion of excessive force when anatomical structures are retracted to create a clear view of the anatomy. Here, we present a comparative study of human and robotic performance in force-controlled organ retraction during laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF). Methods: Six female pigs (20–25 kg) were anesthetized, intubated, and placed on mechanical ventilation; pneumoperitoneum (13 mmHg CO2) was established. A force-sensing retractor (FSR) was constructed to record the forces applied in retracting the stomach during dissection of the esophageal hiatus. The FSR was calibrated using known forces and then operated by either human alone or robot under human guidance using the FSR data. The esophageal hiatus was visualized and dissected, and LNF was completed. Results: Less force was needed for robotic (74.3 ± 10.5 g; mean ± standard deviation) than for human (108.9 ± 34.3 g) retraction (p= 0.007) to obtain an optimal view of the esophageal hiatus. No significant differences were observed for retraction setup time (robot, 14.3 ± 0.8 min; human, 13.7 ± 9.9 min; mean ± SD) or hiatal dissection time (robot, 14.0 ± 3.0 min; human, 14.0 ± 6.1 min; mean ± SD). Conclusions: These preliminary results illustrate our continuing effort to develop and evaluate an automated surgical assistant for laparoscopy. As more personnel-intensive advanced laparoscopic procedures are performed, robotic retraction is likely to offer a superior alternative to human retraction; it minimizes the forces exerted on the organs while maintaining excellent anatomical view.

DOI: 10.1007/s004649901013

Extracted Key Phrases

6 Figures and Tables

Statistics

010002000'04'06'08'10'12'14'16
Citations per Year

1,235 Citations

Semantic Scholar estimates that this publication has 1,235 citations based on the available data.

See our FAQ for additional information.

Cite this paper

@article{Poulose1999HumanVR, title={Human vs robotic organ retraction during laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication}, author={Benjamin K. Poulose and Michael Kutka and Mario Mendoza-Sagaon and Anthony C. Barnes and Chunxiao Yang and Russell H. Taylor and Mark Talamini}, journal={Surgical Endoscopy}, year={1999}, volume={13}, pages={461-465} }