Human status criteria: Sex differences and similarities across 14 nations.

  title={Human status criteria: Sex differences and similarities across 14 nations.},
  author={David M. Buss and Patrick K. Durkee and Todd K. Shackelford and Brian F. Bowdle and David P Schmitt and Gary L. Brase and Jae C. Choe and Irina Trofimova},
  journal={Journal of personality and social psychology},
Social status is a central and universal feature of our highly social species. Reproductively relevant resources, including food, territory, mating opportunities, powerful coalitional alliances, and group-provided health care, flow to those high in status and trickle only slowly to those low in status. Despite its importance and centrality to human social group living, the scientific understanding of status contains a large gap in knowledge-the precise criteria by which individuals are accorded… Expand
Psychological foundations of human status allocation
It is found that benefit-generation affordances uniquely predicted status allocations across nations, whereas cost-infliction affordances were weak or null competing predictors, suggesting that inflicting costs without generating benefits does not reliably increase status among established human groups around the world. Expand
Pandemic Leadership: Sex Differences and Their Evolutionary–Developmental Origins
This review article contextualizes sex differences in pandemic leadership in an evolutionary framework and indicates that against the invisible viral foe that can bring nations to their knees, the strategic circumspection of empathic feminine health “worriers” may bring more effective and humanitarian outcomes than the devil-may-care incaution of masculine risk-taking “warriors”. Expand
Universal and variable leadership dimensions across human societies
Abstract Many researchers have turned to evolutionary theory to better understand diversity in leadership. Evolutionary theories of leadership, in turn, draw on ethnographic cases of societiesExpand
The content and structure of reputation domains across human societies: a view from the evolutionary social sciences
The need for future research on the evolution of cooperation and human sociality to consider a wider range of reputation domains, as well as their social, ecological and gender-specific variability is highlighted. Expand
Proximate and Ultimate Perspectives on Romantic Love
It is shown that romantic love probably evolved in concert with pair-bonds in the authors' recent ancestors and is a suite of adaptions and by-products that is caused by social, psychological mate choice, genetic, neural, and endocrine mechanisms. Expand
It Takes Two to Tango: Development, Validation, and Personality Correlates of the Acceptance of Sugar Relationships in Older Men and Women Scale (ASR-OMWS)
The results showed that the Acceptance of Sugar Relationships in Older Men and Women Scale (ASR-OMWS) proved to be a reliable and conceptually valid measure of older individuals’ attitude toward sugar relationships. Expand
Beliefs about whether spending implies wealth
Spending is influenced by many factors. One that has received little attention is the meaning that people give to the act of spending. Spending money might imply that someone is relativelyExpand


"Human status criteria: Sex differences and similarities across 14 nations": Correction to Buss et al. (2020).
Investigating status criteria across 14 countries provides the first systematic documentation of potentially universal and sex-differentiated status criteria and outlines important next steps in understanding the psychology of status. Expand
Men’s status and reproductive success in 33 nonindustrial societies: Effects of subsistence, marriage system, and reproductive strategy
The results suggest that traits that facilitate status acquisition were not subject to substantially greater selection with domestication of plants and animals, and are part of reproductive strategies that enhance fertility more than offspring well-being. Expand
What’s in a Name? Status, Power, and Other Forms of Social Hierarchy
Despite a long history in social sciences such as anthropology and sociology, status has not received its deserved status in psychology and related domains such as management. This chapter attemptsExpand
The role of physical formidability in human social status allocation.
It is argued that adaptations for formidability-based status allocation may have facilitated the evolution of group cooperation in humans and other primates. Expand
The Pursuit of Status in Social Groups
Status differences are ubiquitous and highly consequential. Yet with regard to human social groups, basic questions persist about how status differences develop. In particular, little is known aboutExpand
Hunting, social status and biological fitness
Despite the impression that most of the benefits that accrue to good hunters are in the form of extra‐marital mating opportunities, it is argued instead that most benefits may be gained within rather than outside marital unions. Expand
Sex Differences in Mate Preferences Across 45 Countries: A Large-Scale Replication
Using a new 45-country sample (N = 14,399), this work attempted to replicate classic studies and test both the evolutionary and biosocial role perspectives, finding neither pathogen prevalence nor gender equality robustly predicted sex differences or preferences across countries. Expand
Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures
Contemporary mate preferences can provide important clues to human reproductive history. Little is known about which characteristics people value in potential mates. Five predictions were made aboutExpand
Is the desire for status a fundamental human motive? A review of the empirical literature.
The relevant evidence suggests that the desire for status is indeed fundamental, and the importance of status was observed across individuals who differed in culture, gender, age, and personality, supporting the universality of the status motive. Expand
Broadening horizons: Sample diversity and socioecological theory are essential to the future of psychological science
  • M. Gurven
  • Psychology, Medicine
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • 2018
Two examples demonstrating how socioecological variability can help explain psychological trait expression are highlighted, illustrating how appropriate theory can be a powerful tool to help determine choices of diverse study populations and improve the social sciences. Expand