Human Races: Classifying People vs Understanding Diversity

@article{Barbujani2005HumanRC,
  title={Human Races: Classifying People vs Understanding Diversity},
  author={Guido Barbujani},
  journal={Current Genomics},
  year={2005},
  volume={6},
  pages={215-226}
}
The idea that all humans naturally belong to one of a few biological types or races that evolved in isolation was unchallenged for centuries, but large-scale modern studies failed to associate racial labels with recognizable genetic clus- ters. Recently, the conclusions of those studies have been questioned by authors who argue that racial classification has objective scientific bases and is indispensable in epidemiology and genetics. However, no classificatio n is useful if the classification… 

Figures and Tables from this paper

Genetic Basis of Human Biodiversity: An Update
TLDR
In many cases, crucial information about human demographic history has emerged from multidisciplinary analyses, which have stressed the importance of cultural, as well as geographical, barriers in causing local divergence of populations.
A reconsideration of the role of self-identified races in epidemiology and biomedical research.
Geographic structure of human genetic variation: medical and evolutionary implications
TLDR
The geographic structure of human populations can be summarized by two numbers: 85 and 15, and two keywords: Continuous Genetic Change (CGC), and outliers, which characterizes most of the differences between groups at different geographic scales.
Inter-chromosomal variation in the pattern of human population genetic structure
TLDR
This approach offers a comprehensive strategy for analysing chromosome-based population structure and differentiation, and demonstrates the application of complementary statistical and functional network analysis in human genetic variation studies.
Race: a social destruction of a biological concept
TLDR
It is nowadays a dominant opinion in a number of disciplines that the taxonomy of human races does not make much biological sense, but by analyzing statements of some leading contemporary scholars who support social constructivism about race it is hoped that their eliminativist views are actually in conflict with what the best contemporary science tells us about human genetic variation.
The justification of race in biological explanation
TLDR
It is shown that the concept of race cannot be justified in biology because it does not lead to successful predictions, and that genetic discontinuities are sufficient to explain differences in diseases but not needed in the explanation.
Global tectonics and human morphological Diversity
Physical anthropology deals with various conditions of the environment and finds connections between them and physical characteristics of populations. In many cases, this approach is sufficient to
Skin color and race
  • N. Jablonski
  • History
    American journal of physical anthropology
  • 2020
TLDR
The history of the use of skin color is reviewed to show how the imprint of history in connection with a single trait influenced subsequent thinking about human diversity and the influence of color memes and race ideation in general on human behavior and the conduct of science.
Genetic admixture, self-reported ethnicity, self-estimated admixture, and skin pigmentation among Hispanics and Native Americans.
TLDR
Within Hispanics, genetic-marker estimated admixture is better predicted by forehead skin pigmentation than by self-estimated admixture, and this results highlight the interplay between culture and biology in how individuals identify and view themselves, and have implications for how ethnicity and disease risk are assessed in a medical setting.
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 114 REFERENCES
Human Races: A Genetic and Evolutionary Perspective
TLDR
Race is generally used as a synonym for subspecies, which traditionally is a geographically circumscribed, genetically differentiated population, but genetic surveys and the analyses of DNA haplotype trees show that human "races" are not distinct lineages.
An apportionment of human DNA diversity.
TLDR
By partitioning genetic variances at three hierarchical levels of population subdivision, it is found that differences between members of the same population account for 84.4% of the total, which is in excellent agreement with estimates based on allele frequencies of classic, protein polymorphisms.
Race, ethnicity, and genomics: social classifications as proxies of biological heterogeneity.
TLDR
The burden of showing the scientific utility of racial and ethic identities in the construction and analysis of genomic resources falls on researchers, which requires that genetic researchers pay as much attention to the social constitution of human populations as presently is paid to their genetic composition.
Evidence for gradients of human genetic diversity within and among continents.
TLDR
The results show that when individuals are sampled homogeneously from around the globe, the pattern seen is one of gradients of allele frequencies that extend over the entire world, rather than discrete clusters, and there is no reason to assume that major genetic discontinuities exist between different continents or "races".
Patterns of human diversity, within and among continents, inferred from biallelic DNA polymorphisms.
TLDR
There is little evidence, if any, of a clear subdivision of humans into biologically defined groups at random biallelic loci, according to a range of statistical methods.
Understanding human DNA sequence variation.
TLDR
Examples of many of the ways these new data can be analyzed from a population perspective using results from the laboratory on multiple individual DNA-based polymorphisms, many clustered in haplotypes, studied in multiple populations representing all major geographic regions of the world are presented.
Genetic Differences Within and Between Populations of the Major Human Subgroups
TLDR
An analysis of all 15 pairwise comparisons among the geographic groups has shown the genetic divergence between major racial groups to be no more than a modest extension of the differences to be found between regions of the same group, accounting for only 51.6 ± 5.1% of the total between-population diversity.
Reconstruction of human evolution: bringing together genetic, archaeological, and linguistic data.
TLDR
The reconstruction of human evolutionary history was checked with statistical techniques such as "boot-strapping" and changes some earlier conclusions and is in agreement with more recent ones, including published and unpublished DNA-marker results.
History and Geography of Human Genes
TLDR
The collaboration between the Forensic Community and the scholars of human population genetics has always been fruitful and of reciprocal benefit in Italy as much as in Europe and in North-America, but the latter with a more dialectical attitude as shown by recent rather hot debates.
Larger genetic differences within africans than between Africans and Eurasians.
TLDR
The pattern in noncoding regions, because they are less affected by natural selection than are coding regions, can reflect better the history of human evolution and can serve as a baseline for understanding the maintenance of SNPs in human populations.
...
...