Human Cannonballs and the First Amendment: Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting Co.

@article{Baird1978HumanCA,
  title={Human Cannonballs and the First Amendment: Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting Co.},
  author={Douglas G. Baird},
  journal={Stanford Law Review},
  year={1978},
  volume={30},
  pages={1185}
}
  • D. Baird
  • Published 1 July 1978
  • Political Science
  • Stanford Law Review
3 Citations

Protecting Performers’ Rights: Does India Need Law Reform?

The rapid growth in technology combined with an increased awareness of intellectual property has led to many countries recognizing importance of a well-developed performer protection regime. Such

References

SHOWING 1-4 OF 4 REFERENCES

may be viewing news shows as a form of entertainment first and information programs second

    In much of copyright law, no need exists for such a factor in fair use because of the operation of the idea-expression distinction, but the distinction has limited usefulness in news-film cases

      See McDaniel, supra note 53

        Cal. 1972) (alternative means characterized as first amendment interest

        • Walt Disney Prod. v. Air Pirates, 345 F. Supp