Human Cannonballs and the First Amendment: Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting Co.

@article{Baird1978HumanCA,
  title={Human Cannonballs and the First Amendment: Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting Co.},
  author={D. Baird},
  journal={Stanford Law Review},
  year={1978},
  volume={30},
  pages={1185}
}
  • D. Baird
  • Published 1978
  • Political Science
  • Stanford Law Review
3 Citations

References

SHOWING 1-4 OF 4 REFERENCES
Cal. 1972) (alternative means characterized as first amendment interest
  • Walt Disney Prod. v. Air Pirates, 345 F. Supp
In much of copyright law, no need exists for such a factor in fair use because of the operation of the idea-expression distinction, but the distinction has limited usefulness in news-film cases
    See McDaniel, supra note 53
      may be viewing news shows as a form of entertainment first and information programs second