Hugo de Vries on Heredity, 1889-1903: Statistics, Mendelian Laws, Pangenes, Mutations

@article{Stamhuis1999HugoDV,
  title={Hugo de Vries on Heredity, 1889-1903: Statistics, Mendelian Laws, Pangenes, Mutations},
  author={Ida H. Stamhuis and Onno G. Meijer},
  journal={Isis},
  year={1999},
  volume={90},
  pages={238 - 267}
}
The essay describes the development of Hugo de Vries's thinking on heredity from the publication of his Intracellulare Pangenesis in 1889 to the publication of Die Mutationstheorie, Volume 2, in 1903. De Vries's work in the 1890s can be characterized as an attempt to defend his theory of pangenes, especially the fundamental and controversial idea that different characters have different material hereditary carriers. Hybridization experiments served his goal. Recently discovered research notes… 
Hugo De Vries: from the theory of intracellular pangenesis to the rediscovery of Mendel.
  • C. Lenay
  • Biology
    Comptes rendus de l'Academie des sciences. Serie III, Sciences de la vie
  • 2000
The Reactions on Hugo de Vries's Intracellular Pangenesis; the Discussion with August Weismann
  • I. Stamhuis
  • Biology
    Journal of the history of biology
  • 2003
In 1889 Hugo de Vries published Intracellular Pangenesis in which heformulated his ideas on heredity. The highexpectations of the impression these ideaswould make did not come true and publicationwas
Modelos microscopicos de heranca no seculo XIX
During the 19th century several microscopic models involving particles arose in search for an explanation for heredity such as: Spencer’s physiological units (1864); Darwin’s hypothesis of pangenesis
Mendelian-Mutationism: The Forgotten Evolutionary Synthesis
TLDR
This work finds no evidence of a delay in synthesizing mutation, rules of discrete inheritance, and selection in a Mendelian-Mutationist Synthesis, and suggests contemporary evolutionary thinking seems closer to their more ecumenical view than to the restrictive mid-twentieth-century consensus known as the Modern Synthesis.
Why the Rediscoverer Ended up on the Sidelines: Hugo De Vries’s Theory of Inheritance and the Mendelian Laws
Eleven years before the ‘rediscovery’ in 1900 of Mendel’s work, Hugo De Vries published his theory of heredity. He expected his theory to become a big success, but it was not well-received. To find
De Vries’ Mendelism Reassessed
It is now received that de Vries’ work is better characterised as the incorporation of Mendel’s work into his project of the theory of pangenesis. However, there is still lack of a systematic
Mendel's Impact
  • R. Falk
  • Biology
    Science in Context
  • 2006
TLDR
The history of genetics reflects the history of the concept of reductionism in the life sciences, it is proposed, because modern developments of molecular and computational methods finally forced researchers to apply bottom-up methodologies to top-down systems' analyses.
The Hologenome Concept: Human, Animal and Plant Microbiota
TLDR
The hologenome concept presents a novel way of looking at symbiosis as a close association of two or more dissimilar organisms where the association is advantageous to one and does not affect the other(s).
...
1
2
3
4
...

References

SHOWING 1-4 OF 4 REFERENCES
The concepts of dormancy, latency, and dominance in nineteenth-century biology
  • M. Campbell
  • Economics
    Journal of the history of biology
  • 1983
The discovery of dominance has frequently been attributed to T. A. Knight,' J. Goss' and A. Seton3 (or even earlier writers).4 R. C. Olby, for instance, wrote: "The result of the experiments of these
Hugo de Vries No Mendelian?" esp
Prelude to Genetics (cit
Reasoning in Scientific Change