• DOI:10.3847/1538-4357/aaa3f9
• Corpus ID: 118875464

Hubble Space Telescope Trigonometric Parallax of Polaris B, Companion of the Nearest Cepheid

@article{Bond2017HubbleST,
  title={Hubble Space Telescope Trigonometric Parallax of Polaris B, Companion of the Nearest Cepheid},
  author={Howard E. Bond and Edmund P. Nelan and Nancy Remage Evans and Gail H. Schaefer and Dianne L. Harmer},
  journal={The Astrophysical Journal},
  year={2017},
  volume={853}
}

• H. Bond, E. Nelan, +2 authors D. Harmer
• Published 21 December 2017
• Physics
• The Astrophysical Journal

Polaris, the nearest and brightest Cepheid, is a potential anchor point for the Leavitt period–luminosity relation. However, its distance is a matter of contention, with recent advocacy for a parallax of ∼10 mas, in contrast with the Hipparcos measurement of 7.54 ± 0.11 mas. We report an independent trigonometric parallax determination, using the Fine Guidance Sensors (FGS) on the Hubble Space Telescope. Polaris itself is too bright for FGS, so we measured its eighth-magnitude companion Polaris B, relative to a network of background reference stars. We converted the FGS relative parallax to absolute, using estimated distances to the reference stars from ground-based photometry and spectral classification. Our result, 6.26 ± 0.24 mas, is even smaller than that found by Hipparcos. We note other objects for which Hipparcos appears to have overestimated parallaxes, including the well-established case of the Pleiades. We consider possible sources of systematic error in the FGS parallax, but find no evidence they are significant. If our “long” distance is correct, the high luminosity of Polaris indicates that it is pulsating in the second overtone of its fundamental mode. Our results raise several puzzles, including a long pulsation period for Polaris compared to second-overtone pulsators in the Magellanic Clouds, and a conflict between the isochrone age of Polaris B (∼2.1 Gyr) and the much younger age of Polaris A. We discuss possibilities that B is not a physical companion of A, in spite of the strong evidence that it is, or that one of the stars is a merger remnant. These issues may be resolved when Gaia provides parallaxes for both stars.