How to Reconcile Physicalism and Antireductionism about Biology*

@article{Rosenberg2005HowTR,
  title={How to Reconcile Physicalism and Antireductionism about Biology*},
  author={A. Rosenberg and D. Kaplan},
  journal={Philosophy of Science},
  year={2005},
  volume={72},
  pages={43 - 68}
}
  • A. Rosenberg, D. Kaplan
  • Published 2005
  • Philosophy
  • Philosophy of Science
  • Physicalism and antireductionism are the ruling orthodoxy in the philosophy of biology. But these two theses are difficult to reconcile. Merely embracing an epistemic antireductionism will not suffice, as both reductionists and antireductionists accept that given our cognitive interests and limitations, non‐molecular explanations may not be improved, corrected or grounded in molecular ones. Moreover, antireductionists themselves view their claim as a metaphysical or ontological one about the… CONTINUE READING
    32 Citations
    Conservative reduction of biology
    • PDF
    On Gene’s Action and Reciprocal Causation
    • 3
    • Highly Influenced
    On physicalism and Downward Causation in Developmental and Cancer Biology
    • 58
    • PDF
    Complexity and the reductionism–holism debate in systems biology
    • F. Mazzocchi
    • Biology, Medicine
    • Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Systems biology and medicine
    • 2012
    • 52
    Drawing Lessons from the Previous Debate
    Antiscience and Antireductionism
    Stability and lawlikeness
    • 7

    References

    SHOWING 1-10 OF 51 REFERENCES
    How is Biological Explanation Possible?
    • A. Rosenberg
    • Sociology
    • The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science
    • 2001
    • 80
    Why the Anti-Reductionist Consensus Won't Survive: The Case of Classical Mendelian Genetics
    • C. K. Waters
    • Biology
    • PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association
    • 1990
    • 108
    • PDF
    Darwin's dangerous idea.
    • J. Launer
    • Medicine, Biology
    • QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians
    • 2002
    • 415
    • PDF
    Dimensions of Scientific Law
    • 164
    • PDF
    Four decades of scientific explanation
    • 865
    • PDF