• Corpus ID: 1721610

How to Harvest Collective Wisdom on Complex Problems: An Introduction to the MIT Deliberatorium

@inproceedings{Klein2012HowTH,
  title={How to Harvest Collective Wisdom on Complex Problems: An Introduction to the MIT Deliberatorium},
  author={Mark Klein},
  year={2012}
}
Humanity now finds itself faced with pressing and highly complex problems – such as climate change, the spread of disease, international and economic security, and so on that call upon us to bring together large numbers of experts and stakeholders to deliberate collectively on a global scale. Such large-scale deliberations are themselves complex processes, however, with emergent properties that often prevent us from adequately harnessing the community's collective wisdom. Collocated meetings… 
Do You See What I See? Perception and Navigation in Online Deliberation
Some of the most pressing challenges facing humanity today, such as how to respond to climate change or govern the internet, are too complex for any individual or small group to completely understand
Systems for collective human curation of online discussion
TLDR
This thesis presents new systems that empower discussion participants to work collectively to bring order to discussions through a range of curation tools that superimpose richer metadata structure on top of standard discussion formats.
Towards Effective Structure-Based Assessment of Arguments and Proposals in Online Deliberation
Deliberation, i.e., discussing and ranking different proposals and making decisions, is an important issue for many communities, be they political, be they boards of experts for a scientific issue.
Towards Effective Structure-Based Assessment of Proposals and Arguments in Online Deliberation
TLDR
The authors have carried out an experiment with a real-world community which had to make subjective decisions on issues relevant to them, and they have analyzed the data generated by it systematically, covering the different layers of their approach.
Quantitative Modeling of Polarization in Online Intelligent Argumentation and Deliberation for Capturing Collective Intelligence
TLDR
Important polarization attributes such as homogeneity in groups, heterogeneity across groups, the number of poles, and the size of poles are identified to measure polarization in online argumentation.
TruthSift: A platform for collective rationality
  • E. Baum
  • Philosophy
    2016 Future Technologies Conference (FTC)
  • 2016
TLDR
Signs are reviewed that many practically important statements most people believe to be firmly established will be revealed to be firm refuted upon computer assisted scrutiny.
A New Approach to Large-Scale Deliberation
TLDR
A novel approach for group-decision making, i.e., proposing and selecting solutions to issues discussed in online settings, based on the structure of the discussion is proposed, which yields comprehensive discussions and outcome decisions supported by the community.
How Features of a Civic Design Competition Influences the Collective Understanding of a Problem
TLDR
An analysis of a two-month civic design competition focused on transportation challenges in a major US city is presented, examining how the event structure, discussion platform, and participant interactions affected how a community collectively discussed design constraints and proposals.
Effects of Comment Curation and Opposition on Coherence in Online Policy Discussion
TLDR
An asymmetric interaction between participants' initial positions and comment curation was found: participants with different initial positions had unequal reactions to curation that foregrounded comments with which they disagreed.
Towards Greater Perceived Fairness: Crowdsourcing Moderation Work to Online Deliberation Participants
Online deliberation is a way of collecting “wisdom of crowd” through public debate for decision making, problem solving and policy making. Structured online deliberation platforms keep a clear
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 17 REFERENCES
Using Metrics to Enable Large-Scale Deliberation
TLDR
Large-scale argumentation systems represent a promising approach for addressing a range of highly complex problems, by virtue of providing a simple systematic structure that radically reduces redundancy and encourages clarity.
Infotopia: How Many Minds Produce Knowledge
This book explores the human potential to pool widely dispersed information, and to use that knowledge to improve both our institutions and our lives. Various methods for aggregating information are
The wealth of networks: how social production transforms markets and freedom
TLDR
In this comprehensive social theory of the Internet and the networked information economy, Benkler describes how patterns of information, knowledge, and cultural production are changing--and shows that the way information and knowledge are made available can either limit or enlarge the ways people can create and express themselves.
Wikinomics: How Mass Collaboration Changes Everything
The knowledge, resources, and computing power of billions of people are self-organizing into a massive new collective force. Interconnected and orchestrated through blogs, wikis, chat rooms,
Studying cooperation and conflict between authors with history flow visualizations
TLDR
This paper investigates the dynamics of Wikipedia, a prominent, thriving wiki, and focuses on the relevance of authorship, the value of community surveillance in ameliorating antisocial behavior, and how authors with competing perspectives negotiate their differences.
He says, she says: conflict and coordination in Wikipedia
TLDR
The growth of non-direct work in Wikipedia is examined and the development of tools to characterize conflict and coordination costs in Wikipedia are described, which may inform the design of new collaborative knowledge systems.
Experimental Study of Inequality and Unpredictability in an Artificial Cultural Market
TLDR
An artificial “music market” was created in which 14,341 participants downloaded previously unknown songs either with or without knowledge of previous participants' choices, and increasing the strength of social influence increased both inequality and unpredictability of success.
Using shared representations to improve coordination and intent inference
TLDR
Empirical data shows that an automatic plan generation component, driven by information from a coordinating representation, reduces coordination errors and cognitive effort for its users, and a framework is presented for comparing this approach to other strategies for user knowledge acquisition in adaptive systems.
Why Hackers Do What They Do: Understanding Motivation and Effort in Free/Open Source Software Projects
TLDR
It is found that enjoyment-based intrinsic motivation, namely how creative a person feels when working on the project, is the strongest and most pervasive driver.
The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference
the tipping point how little things can make a big difference by is one of the very best seller publications in the world? Have you had it? Not at all? Silly of you. Now, you could get this
...
1
2
...