How to Enlarge NATO: The Debate inside the Clinton Administration, 1993–95

  title={How to Enlarge NATO: The Debate inside the Clinton Administration, 1993–95},
  author={M. Sarotte},
  journal={International Security},
  • M. Sarotte
  • Published 2019
  • Political Science
  • International Security
Newly available sources show how the 1993–95 debate over the best means of expanding the North Atlantic Treaty Organization unfolded inside the Clinton administration. This evidence comes from documents recently declassified by the Clinton Presidential Library, the Defense Department, and the State Department because of appeals by the author. As President Bill Clinton repeatedly remarked, the two key questions about enlargement were when and how. The sources make apparent that, during a… Expand
NATO as a political alliance: continuities and legacies in the enlargement debates of the 1990s
NATO’s ongoing relevance as a political alliance appeared time and again in the debates of the 1990s, as the Western allies struggled to adapt their old institutions to the challenges of a new world,Expand
Evaluating NATO enlargement: scholarly debates, policy implications, and roads not taken
NATO’s enlargement into Central and Eastern Europe after the Cold War is the subject of significant debate in academic and policy circles. With few exceptions, however, this debate focuses on singleExpand
NATO enlargement and US foreign policy: the origins, durability, and impact of an idea
Since the Cold War, NATO enlargement has moved from a contentious issue in US foreign policy debates to an accepted plank in US strategy. What explains this development—why has support forExpand
The overlooked importance of economics: why the Bush Administration wanted NATO enlargement
ABSTRACT This paper shows that, during 1991–1992, the George H.W. Bush Administration settled to pursue NATO enlargement in order to ensure both stability in and influence over Europe. Both wereExpand
An uncertain journey to the promised land: The Baltic states’ road to NATO membership
ABSTRACT Most accounts of NATO enlargement depict it as the implementation of US grand strategy. This article aims to restore agency to the acceding states, specifically the Baltic states who joinedExpand
Patterns of continuity in NATO’s long history
This piece situates the logic of NATO expansion in the immediate post-Cold War era within the broader history of the alliance. It argues that NATO has, since its inception, faced two competingExpand
Land rush: American grand strategy, NATO enlargement, and European fragmentation
  • Paul van Hooft
  • Political Science
  • 2020
This article argues that NATO enlargement, while stabilizing Central and Eastern Europe, still undermined other aspects of European security over the long term. Throughout the 1990s and 2000s, USExpand
‘Nothing but humiliation for Russia’: Moscow and NATO’s eastern enlargement, 1993-1995
ABSTRACT This article recounts Russia’s response to NATO’s eastern enlargement. It argues that NATO enlargement was seen as perfectly acceptable in Moscow, as long as it was inclusive of Russia,Expand
From Hamburg and Munich to Tallinn and Burgas


Why NATO Enlargement Does Not Spread Democracy
  • D. Reiter
  • Political Science
  • International Security
  • 2001
The debate over the costs and beneats of enlarging the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) that preceded the March 1999 inclusion of Poland, Hungary, and the Czech Republic retains policyExpand
Not Whether But When: The U.S. Decision to Enlarge NATO
How did Poland, Hungary, and the Czech Republic become the newest members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization? Based on interviews conducted with more than 75 individuals --from CabinetExpand
NATO Enlargement—Was There a Promise?
Joshua Shifrinson’s article “Deal or No Deal?” presents a oawed account of the negotiations in 1990 that led to the reuniacation of Germany.1 His observations at the end of the piece about RussianExpand
Precluded or Precedent-Setting? The “NATO Enlargement Question” in the Triangular Bonn-Washington-Moscow Diplomacy of 1990–1991
Controversy arose in the mid-1990s when Russian officials accused Western governments of reneging on binding pledges made to Moscow in 1990 during German unification diplomacy. According to theExpand
The False Promise of International Institutions
Since the Cold War ended, Western policymakers have sought to create security arrangements in Europe, as well as in other regions of the globe, that are based on international institutions. In doingExpand
Reconsidering NATO expansion: a counterfactual analysis of Russia and the West in the 1990s
  • K. Marten
  • Political Science
  • European Journal of International Security
  • 2017
Abstract This article re-examines the history of NATO’s original post-Cold War enlargement to include the Visegrad states of Poland, Hungary, and the Czech Republic. It uses both published materialsExpand
The hour of Europe : Western powers and the breakup of Yugoslavia
By looking through the prism of the West's involvement in the breakup of Yugoslavia, this book presents a new examination of the end of the Cold War in Europe. Incorporating declassified documentsExpand
Perpetuating U.S. Preeminence: The 1990 Deals to Bribe the Soviets Out and Move NATO In
  • M. Sarotte
  • Political Science
  • International Security
  • 2010
Washington and Bonn pursued a shared strategy of perpetuating U.S. preeminence in European security after the end of the Cold War. As multilingual evidence shows, they did so primarily by shieldingExpand
Building a New NATO
Three years after the fall of the Berlin Wall, Europe is headed toward crisis. Memories of democracy's triumph have faded. The immense problems facing the new democracies in the East are increasinglyExpand
The Last Empire: The Final Days of the Soviet Union
On Christmas Day, 1991, President George H. W. Bush addressed the nation to declare an American victory in the Cold War: earlier that day Mikhail Gorbachev had resigned as the first and last SovietExpand