How to Be Responsible for Something without Causing It

@inproceedings{Sartorio2004HowTB,
  title={How to Be Responsible for Something without Causing It},
  author={Carolina Sartorio},
  year={2004}
}
condition that is realizable by different combinations of individual omissions by voters. For instance, consider an election with 100 potential voters, in which Bad gets 30 votes, Good gets 20, and the rest are abstentions. Suppose that all of the abstainers are like Lazy: they would have voted for Good if they had voted, but they abstained. Thus, given how things turned out, Good would have won if 11 of the abstainers had voted. It seems, then, that we want to blame the abstainers for the… CONTINUE READING

From This Paper

Topics from this paper.

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
Showing 1-7 of 7 references

Overdetermining Causes,’

J. Schaffer
Philosophical Studies 114, • 2003
View 5 Excerpts
Highly Influenced

Causation in the Law’’, in Edward N

A. M. Honoré
Philosophy and Policy Foundation 16, • 2002
View 9 Excerpts
Highly Influenced

‘ ‘ A Counterfactual Theory of Prevention and ‘ Causation ’ by Omission

P. Dowe
Australasian Journal of Philosophy • 2001
View 1 Excerpt

Preemptive Preemption,’

J. Collins
Journal of Philosophy, • 2000
View 2 Excerpts

Mind in a Physical World, Cambridge, MA: The M.I.T

J. entriescausation-law. Kim
British Journal for the Philosophy of Science • 1998
View 1 Excerpt

Mortal Questions, New York: Cambridge U.P

T. Nagel
Parfit, D • 1979
View 1 Excerpt

‘ ‘ Ability and Responsibility

P. van Inwagen
1978
View 1 Excerpt

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…