How something can be said about telling more than we can know: On choice blindness and introspection

@article{Johansson2006HowSC,
  title={How something can be said about telling more than we can know: On choice blindness and introspection},
  author={Petter Johansson and Lars Hall and Sverker Sikstr{\"o}m and Betty T{\"a}rning and Andreas Gonçalves Lind},
  journal={Consciousness and Cognition},
  year={2006},
  volume={15},
  pages={673-692}
}

Tables from this paper

Awareness of Unawareness Folk Psychology and Introspective Transparency

A tradition of work in cognitive science indicates that much of our mental lives is not available to introspection (e.g. Nisbett and Wilson, 1977; Gopnik, 1993; Wegner, 2002). Though the researchers

Choice Blindness: The Incongruence of Intention, Action and Introspection

This thesis is an empirical and theoretical exploration of the surprising finding that people often may fail to notice dramatic mismatches between what they want and what they get, a phenomenon my

Consequences of Choice Blindness on Memory: Altered Self-Reports Cause Memory-Blindness Distortion

Author(s): Cochran, Kevin | Advisor(s): Loftus, Elizabeth F | Abstract: Previous research on the misinformation effect has demonstrated that memory for events can be distorted by suggestive

False Memories Resulting from a Choice Blindness Task Shapes Future Political Attitudes

In many attitude theories, it is commonly assumed that what we believe in is partly based on our own past actions, and that these actions shape our present opinion towards an issue. This suggests

Choice Blindness as Misinformation: Memory Distortion in an Eyewitness Identification Task

Despite lay intuition, research has shown people often do not notice when an outcome they are presented with differs from a choice they made. The novel choice blindness paradigm investigates the

Choice blindness as a new tool to study preference change

Recent research has shown that we might not be as aware of our choices as we believe ourselves to be - a phenomenon called choice blindness (Johansson et al, 2005). In this thesis I replicate and

People confabulate with high confidence when their decisions are supported by weak internal variables

Using a brain–computer interface, it is shown that internal variables continue to be monitored but are less impactful than deceptive external cues during CB episodes, and that deceptive cues overturn the classical relationship between confidence and accuracy.

Self-Knowledge and Consciousness of Attitudes

Suppose we know our own attitudes, e.g. judgments and decisions, only by unconsciously interpreting ourselves. Would this undermine the assumption that there are conscious attitudes? Carruthers
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 102 REFERENCES

Knowing more about what we can tell: ‘Introspective access' and causal report accuracy 10 years later

Nisbett & Wilson (1977a) proposed that people lack ‘introspective access' to their mental processes, and that retrospective causal reports about those processes are in general inaccurate. This paper

Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes.

Evidence is reviewed which suggests that there may be little or no direct introspective access to higher order cognitive processes. Subjects are sometimes (a) unaware of the existence of a stimulus

When can we introspect accurately about mental processes?

Evidence is presented in support of the view that when concept learning occurs solely by automatic frequency processing, introspection reports are inaccurate, but when the nature of the task prompts intentional hypothesis testing, introspective reports are accurate, revealing clues that subjects engage in a conscious hypothesisesting strategy.

Awareness of Cognitive Processes: Replications and Revisions

Summary Nisbett and Wilson have suggested that people have little or no awareness of their higher cognitive processes. When asked to report reasons for choices and behavior initiation, they report a

The Intentional Stance.

How are we able to understand and anticipate each other in everyday life, in our daily interactions? Through the use of such "folk" concepts as belief, desire, intention, and expectation, asserts

Causal report accuracy: Retrospect and prospect

Reality Monitoring

People remember information from two basic sources: that derived from external sources (obtained through perceptual processes) and that generated by internal processes such as reasoning, imagination,

Hedging in Scientifically Oriented Discourse. Exploring Variation According to Discipline and Intended Audience

such cases might at times give rise to ambiguity, but in my data the intended meanings of such occurrences could be ferreted out with the help of the context. 55 As Greenbaum (1969: e.g. 174 ff.)
...