How reliable is the clinical exam in detecting ocular chlamydial infection?
@article{Miller2004HowRI, title={How reliable is the clinical exam in detecting ocular chlamydial infection?}, author={Kevin C. Miller and Greg F. Schmidt and Muluken Melese and Wondu Alemayehu and Elizabeth Yi and Vicky Cevallos and Cathy Donnellan and Lynn Olinger and Demeke Fantaye and Bruce D. Gaynor and John P. Whitcher and Thomas M. Lietman}, journal={Ophthalmic epidemiology}, year={2004}, volume={11 3}, pages={ 255-62 } }
PURPOSE
To describe the relationship between the clinical exam for trachoma and the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for ocular chlamydia.
METHODS
One hundred children in a trachoma-endemic area of Ethiopia were examined three times and swabbed twice for PCR analysis. The assays were compared, and an analysis of the variance between exam and PCR was performed.
RESULTS
Inter-examiner agreement was 0.57 (Cohen's kappa), inter-PCR agreement 0.98, and agreement between examiner and PCR, 0.26-0… CONTINUE READING
Topics from this paper.
Citations
Publications citing this paper.
SHOWING 1-10 OF 36 CITATIONS
Trachoma surveys 2000-2005: results, recent advances in methodology, and factors affecting the determination of prevalence.
VIEW 7 EXCERPTS
CITES BACKGROUND & RESULTS
HIGHLY INFLUENCED
Conjunctival FOXP 3 expression in trachoma : do regulatory T cells have a role in human ocular Chlamydia trachomatis infection ?
VIEW 2 EXCERPTS
CITES RESULTS & BACKGROUND