How psychopaths threaten moral rationalism: Is it irrational to be amoral?

  title={How psychopaths threaten moral rationalism: Is it irrational to be amoral?},
  author={S. Nichols},
  journal={The Monist},
  • S. Nichols
  • Published 2002
  • Philosophy
  • The Monist
  • Over the last 20 years, a number of central figures in moral philosophy have defended some version of moral rationalism, the idea that morality is based on reason or rationality (e.g., Gewirth 1978, Darwall 1983, Nagel 1970, 1986, Korsgaard 1986, Singer 1995; Smith 1994, 1997). According to rationalism, morality is based on reason or rationality rather than the emotions or cultural idiosyncrasies, and this has seemed to many to be the best way of securing a kind of objectivism about moral… CONTINUE READING
    Conscience as the rational deficit of psychopaths
    • 2
    • Highly Influenced
    Do psychopaths really threaten moral rationalism?
    • 34
    • Highly Influenced
    Psychopathy and Responsibility Theory
    • 2
    Moral Understanding in the Psychopath.
    • 7
    Moral Unreason: The Case of Psychopathy
    • 62
    • Highly Influenced
    • PDF
    Rational Requirements for Moral Motivation: The Psychopath's Open Question
    To treat a psychopath
    • 18
    Psychopathy, Moral Understanding and Criminal Responsibility
    • 4
    • PDF
    A Dual-Process Account of Moral Judgment: What Psychopaths Can Teach Us About Morality


    Publications referenced by this paper.
    A cognitive developmental approach to morality: investigating the psychopath
    • 1,190
    • PDF
    An objection to Smith's argument for internalism
    • 9
    Skepticism about Practical Reason
    • 350
    • Highly Influential
    • PDF
    The Emergence of Morality in Young Children
    • 563
    Theory of Mind in the psychopath
    • 190
    The argument for internalism: reply to Miller
    • 28
    The view from nowhere
    • 3,156
    • PDF