How proportional are the ‘British AMS’ systems?

@article{Dunleavy2004HowPA,
  title={How proportional are the ‘British AMS’ systems?},
  author={Patrick Dunleavy and H. Margetts},
  journal={Representation},
  year={2004},
  volume={40},
  pages={316 - 328}
}
  • Patrick Dunleavy, H. Margetts
  • Published 2004
  • Political Science
  • Representation
  • Abstract This article explores the performance of the additional member systems of proportional representation introduced in the UK for elections to the Scottish Parliament, the National Assembly for Wales and the Greater London Assembly. It sets out the key features of these systems and examines how they have fared in terms of delivering (more) proportional results, using a range of measures of deviation from proportionality. On all measures the British AMS systems have relatively high levels… CONTINUE READING
    6 Citations

    References

    SHOWING 1-10 OF 20 REFERENCES
    Mixed Electoral Systems in Britain and the Jenkins Commission on Electoral Reform
    • 16
    “Effective” Number of Parties
    • 2,489
    Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World's Electoral Systems
    • 1,915
    • PDF
    Mixed electoral systems: An overview
    • 25
    Devolution Votes: PR Elections in Scotland and Wales
    • 1997
    Electing members of the Lords (or Senate)', included on the CD
    • 1999