How participatory action research changed our view of the challenges of shared decision-making training.


OBJECTIVE This paper aims to demonstrate how the use of participatory action research (PAR) helped us identify ways to respond to communication challenges associated with shared decision-making (SDM) training. METHODS Patients, relatives, researchers, and health professionals were involved in a PAR process that included: (1) two theatre workshops, (2) a pilot study of an SDM training module involving questionnaires and evaluation meetings, and (3) three reflection workshops. RESULTS The PAR process revealed that health professionals often struggled with addressing existential issues such as concerns about life, relationships, meaning, and ability to lead responsive dialogue. Following the PAR process, a communication programme that included communication on existential issues and coaching was drafted. CONCLUSION By involving multiple stakeholders in a comprehensive PAR process, valuable communication skills addressing a broader understanding of SDM were identified. A communication programme aimed to enhance skills in a mindful and responsive clinical dialogue on the expectations, values, and hopes of patients and their relatives was drafted. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS Before integrating new communication concepts such as SDM in communication training, research methods such as PAR can be used to improve understanding and identify the needs and priorities of both patients and health professionals.

DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.11.002

Cite this paper

@article{Ammentorp2017HowPA, title={How participatory action research changed our view of the challenges of shared decision-making training.}, author={Jette Ammentorp and Maiken Wolderslund and Connie Timmermann and Henry Larsen and Karina Dahl Steffensen and Annegrethe Nielsen and Marianne E Lau and Bodil Winther and Lars Henrik Jensen and Elisabeth Assing Hvidt and Niels Christian Hvidt and P{\aa}l Gulbrandsen}, journal={Patient education and counseling}, year={2017} }