# How many times do we need and assumption ?

@article{Haeusler2014HowMT, title={How many times do we need and assumption ?}, author={Edward Hermann Haeusler}, journal={ArXiv}, year={2014}, volume={abs/1405.0541} }

In this article we present a class of formulas Fn, n in Nat, that need at least 2^n assumptions to be proved in a normal proof in Natural Deduction for purely implicational minimal propositional logic. In purely implicational classical propositional logic, with Peirce's rule, each Fn is proved with only one assumption in Natural Deduction in a normal proof. Hence, the formulas Fn have exponentially sized proofs in cut-free Sequent Calculus and Tableaux. In fact 2^n is the lower-bound for normal…

## References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 21 REFERENCES

### Proof-graphs for Minimal Implicational Logic

- Mathematics, Computer ScienceDCM
- 2013

The aim of this work is to study how to reduce the weight of propositional deductions, and presents the formalism of proof-graphs for purely implicational logic, which are graphs of a specific shape that are intended to capture the logical structure of a deduction.

### Eigenvariables, bracketing and the decidability of positive minimal predicate logic

- Mathematics, PhilosophyTheor. Comput. Sci.
- 2006

### Propositional Logics Complexity and the Sub-Formula Property

- PhilosophyDCM
- 2014

This work extends Statman result and shows that any propositional (possibly modal) structural logic satisfying a particular formulation of the sub-formula principle is in PSPACE, if and only if, PSPACE=EXPTIME.

### Intuitionistic Propositional Logic is Polynomial-Space Complete

- PhilosophyTheor. Comput. Sci.
- 1979

### PROOF-NETS : THE PARALLEL SYNTAX FOR PROOF-THEORY

- Computer Science
- 1996

The paper is mainly concerned with the extension of proof-nets to additives, for which the best known solution is presented, which is shown to be compatible with quantifiers, and the structural rules of exponentials are also accommodated.

### A New Normalization Strategy for the Implicational Fragment of Classical Propositional Logic

- PhilosophyStud Logica
- 2010

Every derivation Π in the implicational fragment can be transformed into a derivationΠ′ such that no application of Peirce’s rule in Π′ occurs above applications of →-introduction and →-elimination, and a form of Glivenko's theorem for the classical {→}-fragment is obtained.

### First-Order Logic

- Mathematics
- 1968

I. Propositional Logic from the Viewpoint of Analytic Tableaux.- I. Preliminaries.- 0. Foreword on Trees.- 1. Formulas of Propositional Logic.- 2. Boolean Valuations and Truth Sets.- II. Analytic…