How local is the local field potential?

Abstract

Local field potentials (LFPs) are of growing importance in neurophysiological investigations. LFPs supplement action potential recordings by indexing activity relevant to EEG, magnetoencephalographic, and hemodynamic (fMRI) signals. Recent reports suggest that LFPs reflect activity within very small domains of several hundred micrometers. We examined this conclusion by comparing LFP, current source density (CSD), and multiunit activity (MUA) signals in macaque auditory cortex. Estimated by frequency tuning bandwidths, these signals' "listening areas" differ systematically with an order of MUA < CSD < LFP. Computational analyses confirm that observed LFPs receive local contributions. Direct measurements indicate passive spread of LFPs to sites more than a centimeter from their origins. These findings appear to be independent of the frequency content of the LFP. Our results challenge the idea that LFP recordings typically integrate over extremely circumscribed local domains. Rather, LFPs appear as a mixture of local potentials with "volume conducted" potentials from distant sites.

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2202-12-S1-O8

Extracted Key Phrases

050201220132014201520162017
Citations per Year

334 Citations

Semantic Scholar estimates that this publication has 334 citations based on the available data.

See our FAQ for additional information.

Cite this paper

@inproceedings{Lindn2011HowLI, title={How local is the local field potential?}, author={Henrik Lind{\'e}n and Tom Tetzlaff and Tobias C Potjans and Klas H Pettersen and Sonja Gr{\"{u}n and Markus Diesmann and Gaute T Einevoll}, booktitle={BMC Neuroscience}, year={2011} }