How female fellows fared at the Royal Society

@article{Fyfe2018HowFF,
  title={How female fellows fared at the Royal Society},
  author={Aileen Fyfe and C. M. R{\o}stvik},
  journal={Nature},
  year={2018},
  volume={555},
  pages={159-161}
}
Archive study shows that formal inclusion of women does not automatically lead to their full participation, say Aileen Fyfe and Camilla Mørk Røstvik. Archive study shows that formal inclusion of women does not automatically lead to their full participation, say Aileen Fyfe and Camilla Mørk Røstvik. 
View on Springer
media.nature.com
1 Citations
Background Citations
1

Topics from this paper

One Citation

Citation Type

Citation Type

Managing the Growth of Peer Review at the Royal Society Journals, 1865-1965
  • 3

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 11 REFERENCES
The women Fellows’ jubilee
  • J. Mason
  • Sociology
  • Notes and Records of the Royal Society of London
  • 1995
  • 17
Ladies, Gentlemen, and Scientific Publication at the Royal Society, 1945–1990
  • 4
  • PDF
Gender, Family Characteristics, and Publication Productivity among Scientists
  • 347
‘Where are your intelligent mothers to come from?’: marriage and family in the scientific career of Dame Kathleen Lonsdale FRS (1903–71)
  • M. Baldwin
  • Sociology, Medicine
  • Notes and Records of the Royal Society
  • 2009
  • 6
  • PDF
Gender bias in scholarly peer review
  • 100
  • PDF
The admission of the first women to the Royal Society of London
  • J. Mason
  • Sociology
  • Notes and Records of the Royal Society of London
  • 1992
  • 25
An ambivalent alliance. Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality.
  • 1,310
  • PDF
THE ROYAL SOCIETY AND THE PREHISTORY OF PEER REVIEW, 1665–1965
  • 40
  • PDF
A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth-Century England
  • 919
Diversity Data Report 2016 (Royal Society, 2017); available at http://go.nature
  • O L 5
  • 2018
...
1
2
...