How do people perceive graphical risk communication? The role of subjective numeracy

@article{Hess2011HowDP,
  title={How do people perceive graphical risk communication? The role of subjective numeracy},
  author={Rebecca Hess and Vivianne H M Visschers and Michael Siegrist and Carmen Keller},
  journal={Journal of Risk Research},
  year={2011},
  volume={14},
  pages={47 - 61}
}
This study aims to evaluate directly how a graphical risk ladder is perceived and how this perception is related to people’s subjective numeracy. Gaze durations and frequencies were used to examine visual attention. Participants (N = 47) appeared to focus on the target risk information, whereas referential information was less attended. Subjective numeracy was negatively correlated with total watching time and the absolute number of gaze events. Results suggest that participants with low… 

Numeric and graphic risk information processing of high and low numerates in the intuitive and deliberative decision modes: An eye-tracker study

TLDR
It is suggested that pictographs attract low numerates' attention, and percentages attract high numerate' attention in the first, intuitive, phase of numeric information processing, which is an important precondition of risk understanding and decision making.

Designing Visual Aids That Promote Risk Literacy: A Systematic Review of Health Research and Evidence-Based Design Heuristics

TLDR
Transparent visual aids robustly improved risk understanding in diverse individuals by encouraging thorough deliberation, enhancing cognitive self-assessment, and reducing conceptual biases in memory.

Should Health Numeracy Be Assessed Objectively or Subjectively?

TLDR
Comparing numeracy assessments obtained using the subjective numeracy scale (SNS) and 5 objective numeracy scales is conducted to determine the proper use of objective versus subjective numerACY assessments in medical decision-making research.

Using visual displays to communicate risk of cancer to women from diverse race/ethnic backgrounds.

Message Formats, Numeracy, Risk Perceptions of Alcohol-Attributable Cancer, and Intentions for Binge Drinking Among College Students

TLDR
It is found that a majority of participants perceive some risks of alcohol-attributable cancer, and risk messages in tabular and graphic formats are more effective in elevating risk perceptions, but there is no significant difference between these two formats.

Measuring Graph Literacy without a Test

TLDR
In about 1 minute, the SGL scale provides a reliable, robust, and valid assessment of skills and risk communication preferences and evokes fewer negative emotional reactions than the OGL scale.

Running Head: GRAPH LITERACY AND PROCESSING OF HEALTH GRAPHS Word count: 8,074 How People with Low and High Graph Literacy Process Health Graphs: Evidence from Eye-Tracking

Graphs facilitate the communication of important quantitative information, often serving as effective decision support tools. Yet, graphs are not equally useful for all individuals, as people differ

Numeracy Predicts More Effortful and Elaborative Search Strategies in a Complex Risky Choice Context: A Process‐Tracing Approach

The goal of the current study was to explore information search and processing differences between individuals who are less and more numerate in an attempt to better understand the mechanisms that

Examining determinants of health numeracy and processing of numeric health information by English-as-a-second language immigrants to Canada

TLDR
The overall objectives of this study were to investigate how speakers of low and high numeric concept languages process numeric health information when the information is presented in a language which is not their primary or first language.

How Well Do Commonly Used Data Presentation Formats Support Comparative Effectiveness Evaluations?

  • J. DolanFeng QianP. Veazie
  • Medicine
    Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making
  • 2012
TLDR
None of the data presentation formats studied can reliably provide patients, especially those with low subjective numeracy, with an accurate understanding of comparative effectiveness information.

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 48 REFERENCES

Effect of Risk Communication Formats on Risk Perception Depending on Numeracy

  • C. KellerM. Siegrist
  • Medicine
    Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making
  • 2009
TLDR
Overall, the pictogram resulted in significantly lower risk ratings compared with the Paling Perspective Scale and the ratio with numerator 1, but the effect is qualified by patients' numeracy skills.

Validation of the Subjective Numeracy Scale: Effects of Low Numeracy on Comprehension of Risk Communications and Utility Elicitations

TLDR
The Subjective Numeracy Scale effectively predicts both risk comprehension and completion of utility elicitations without requiring survey participants to complete time-consuming and stress-inducing mathematics tests.

How Does the General Public Evaluate Risk Information? The Impact of Associations with Other Risks

TLDR
This study investigated whether people related unknown risks to known risks and showed that the semantic category of the unknown risks was more important in forming associations than the perceived level of risk or specific risk characteristics.

Numeracy and Decision Making

TLDR
Findings were consistent with highly numerate individuals being more likely to retrieve and use appropriate numerical principles, thus making themselves less susceptible to framing effects, and their affective responses were more precise.

Measuring Numeracy without a Math Test: Development of the Subjective Numeracy Scale

TLDR
The Subjective Numeracy Scale (SNS), an 8-item measure, correlates well with mathematical test measures of objective numeracy but can be administered in less time and with less burden, and shows much lower rates of missing or incomplete data.

Probability Information in Risk Communication: A Review of the Research Literature

TLDR
It is concluded that future research and risk communication practitioners should not only concentrate on the presentation format of the probability information but also on the situation in which this message is presented, as this may predict how people process the information and how this may influence their interpretation of the risk.

Clinical Implications of Numeracy: Theory and Practice

TLDR
An overview of research on health numeracy is provided and superior quantitative processing seems to be achieved by focusing on qualitative gist and affective meaning, which has important implications for empowering patients to take advantage of the evidence in evidence-based medicine.

A New Scale for Assessing Perceptions of Chance

TLDR
The magnifier scale and the linear number scale are similar in validity, reliability, and usability, however, only the magnifiers makes it possible to elicit perceptions in the low-probability range (<1%).

Evaluating Risk Communication: Examining Target Audience Perceptions About Four Presentation Formats for Fish Consumption Health Advisory Information

  • N. ConnellyB. Knuth
  • Business
    Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis
  • 1998
TLDR
Examination of four elements of risk information presentation format indicated that multiple formats are required to meet the needs of a significant percent of anglers for three of the four format types examined.