• DOI:10.1007/978-3-642-11381-9_11
• Corpus ID: 141355246

How can transdisciplinary research contribute to knowledge democracy

@inproceedings{Bunders2010HowCT,
  title={How can transdisciplinary research contribute to knowledge democracy},
  author={Joske F. G. Bunders and Jacqueline E. W. Broerse and F. Keil and Christian Pohl and Roland W. Scholz and Marjolein B. M. Zweekhorst},
  year={2010}
}

• J. Bunders, J. Broerse, +3 authors M. Zweekhorst
• Published 2010
• Political Science

In any society, a wide diversity of actors has relevant knowledge concerning important societal problems. In a knowledge democracy both dominant and non-dominant actors have equal access and ability to put this knowledge forward in the process of solving societal problems. In order to enable these actors to contribute meaningfully to decision-making around public policy and research agendas, we argue that a transdisciplinary research process is needed. In this chapter we critically reflect on the principles, concepts and core methods of transdisciplinary research. We first look at the national historical roots of transdisciplinary research, specifically focussing on two countries – Switzerland and The Netherlands. Next we develop a typology of transdisciplinary research. From the perspective of knowledge democracy, we can distinguish two important dimensions in research approaches: the degree of knowledge input of lay groups that is included in a specific transdisciplinary project and the degree in which non-dominant actors are explicitly involved in the decision-making of the development process of policies or research agendas. This results in two different styles of transdisciplinary research. We discuss the similarities and differences of these different styles and approaches. We close this chapter with a discussion on transdisciplinary research styles in relation to forms of democracy – on the one hand basic and representative democracy and on the other hand deliberative democracy.