• DOI:10.1103/PhysRevE.104.054307
• Corpus ID: 237353683

How a minority can win: Unrepresentative outcomes in a simple model of voter turnout.

@article{Landgren2021HowAM,
  title={How a minority can win: Unrepresentative outcomes in a simple model of voter turnout.},
  author={Ekaterina Landgren and Jonas L. Juul and Steven H. Strogatz},
  journal={Physical review. E},
  year={2021},
  volume={104 5-1},
  pages={
          054307
        }
}

• Ekaterina Landgren, Jonas L. Juul, S. Strogatz
• Published 27 August 2021
• Economics
• Physical review. E

The outcome of an election depends not only on which candidate is more popular, but also on how many of their voters actually turn out to vote. Here we consider a simple model in which voters abstain from voting if they think their vote would not matter. Specifically, they do not vote if they feel sure their preferred candidate will win anyway (a condition we call complacency), or if they feel sure their candidate will lose anyway (a condition we call dejectedness). The voters reach these decisions based on a myopic assessment of their local network, which they take as a proxy for the entire electorate: voters know which candidate their neighbors prefer and they assume-perhaps incorrectly-that those neighbors will turn out to vote, so they themselves cast a vote if and only if it would produce a tie or a win for their preferred candidate in their local neighborhood. We explore various network structures and distributions of voter preferences and find that certain structures and parameter regimes favor unrepresentative outcomes where a minority faction wins, especially when the locally preferred candidate is not representative of the electorate as a whole.