How Wenzel and cassie were wrong.

  title={How Wenzel and cassie were wrong.},
  author={Lichao Gao and Thomas J. McCarthy},
  journal={Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids},
  volume={23 7},
  • L. Gao, T. J. McCarthy
  • Published 22 February 2007
  • Chemistry, Medicine
  • Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids
We argue using experimental data that contact lines and not contact areas are important in determining wettability. Three types of two-component surfaces were prepared that contain "spots" in a surrounding field: a hydrophilic spot in a hydrophobic field, a rough spot in a smooth field, and a smooth spot in a rough field. Water contact angles were measured within the spots and with the spot confined to within the contact line of the sessile drop. Spot diameter and contact line diameter were… Expand
A new wetting mechanism based upon triple contact line pinning.
A new model based upon the TCL pinning is developed to explain the different wetting properties of the Wenzel and Cassie models for hydrophilic and hydrophobic cases and predicts the macroscopic contact angle in a broader range accurately, which is consistent with the existing experimental findings. Expand
Dependency of Contact Angles on Three-Phase Contact Line: A Review
The wetted area of a sessile droplet on a practical substrate is limited by the three-phase contact line and characterized by contact angle, contact radius and drop height. Although, contact anglesExpand
Can One Predict a Drop Contact Angle?
The study of wetting phenomena is of great interest due to the multifaceted technological applications of hydrophobic and hydrophilic surfaces. The theoretical approaches proposed by Wenzel and laterExpand
Comparison of wetting models and geometrical analysis in describing the effect of cavity number, size, and position on apparent contact angle
Abstract A critical subject of surface science is whether contact area or the triple-phase contact line (TPCL) directly affects the apparent contact angle (APCA). On this premise, effect of cavityExpand
The debate on the dependence of apparent contact angles on drop contact area or three-phase contact line: A review
Abstract A sessile drop is an isolated drop which has been deposited on a solid substrate where the wetted area is limited by the three-phase contact line and characterized by contact angle, contactExpand
Wetting on axially-patterned heterogeneous surfaces.
In this study, axial models of smooth heterogeneous surface were chosen in order to mitigate contact angle multiplicity and allowed clarifying concepts usually misleading in wetting phenomena. Expand
Validity of the equations for the contact angle on real surfaces
The wetting property between liquid and solid is very important in many industries besides natural systems. The simplest method to determine the wetting property is just dropping a liquid drop on aExpand
Wetting on Flat and Smooth Surfaces
The Young’s contact angle gives a notion of wettability when a liquid wets and spreads on a solid surface. However, it is also a source of arguments and controversies in the literature. The objectiveExpand
Effect of three-phase contact line topology on dynamic contact angles on heterogeneous surfaces.
It is reported that the contact angle is independent of area void fraction for surfaces with microcavities, which correspond to situations when the advancing contact line is continuous, in contrast with Cassie-Baxter theory, which uses areavoid fraction as the determining parameter, regardless of the type of roughness. Expand
Wetting of Composite Surfaces: When and Why Is the Area Far from The Triple Line Important?
Apparent contact angles are totally governed by the area of the solid surface adjacent to the triple (three-phase) line. However, apparent contact angles do not describe the wetting situationExpand