How To Think About Philosophical Methodology

  title={How To Think About Philosophical Methodology},
  author={Jennifer Nado},
  journal={Journal of Indian Council of Philosophical Research},
  • Jennifer Nado
  • Published 23 August 2017
  • Philosophy, Psychology
  • Journal of Indian Council of Philosophical Research
Experimental philosophy, at least in its ‘negative’ variety, has standardly been portrayed as presenting a dramatic challenge to traditional philosophical methodology. As such, it has prompted a large variety of counter-arguments and defenses of intuition. In this paper, I argue that many of these objections to experimental philosophy rest on various oversimplifications that both experimental philosophers and their opponents have made regarding intuitions and philosophical methodology. Once… 
1 Citations

Concurrent Disorders and Recovery in Forensic Psychiatric Settings

Creating more opportunities for prisoners to stay connected with loved ones and offering meaningful activities would lead to remand prisoners having better self-images, less stress, and more hope for the future in their return to society.



Intuitions, Counter-Examples, and Experimental Philosophy

Practitioners of the new ‘experimental philosophy’ have collected data that appear to show that some philosophical intuitions are culturally variable. Many experimental philosophers take this to pose

Philosophical Criticisms of Experimental Philosophy

The philosophical relevance of experimental psychology is hard to dispute. Much more controversial is the so-called negative program’s critique of armchair philosophical methodology, in particular

How (not) to react to experimental philosophy

In this paper, I am going to offer a reconstruction of a challenge to intuition-based armchair philosophy that has been put forward by experimental philosophers of a restrictionist stripe, which I

Experimental philosophy and philosophical intuition

The topic is experimental philosophy as a naturalistic movement, and its bearing on the value of intuitions in philosophy. This paper explores first how the movement might bear on philosophy more


Experimental philosophy is the name for a recent movement whose participants use the methods of experimental psychology to probe the way people think about philosophical issues and then examine how

Analytic epistemology and experimental philosophy

It has been standard philosophical practice in analytic philosophy to employ intuitions generated in response to thought-experiments as evidence in the evaluation of philosophical claims. In part as

Intuitions in philosophy: a minimal defense

In Philosophy Without Intuitions, Herman Cappelen (2012) focuses on the metaphilosophical thesis he calls Centrality: contemporary analytic philosophers rely on intuitions as evidence for

The “unreliability” of epistemic intuitions

According to a rather common way of thinking about philosophical methodology, philosophical intuitions play a significant role in contemporary philosophy. On this view, they are an essential part of


: Some proponents of “experimental philosophy” criticize philosophers' use of thought experiments on the basis of evidence that the verdicts vary with truth-independent factors. However, their data

Scepticism About Intuition

Contemporary philosophy’s antipathy to intuition can come to seem baffling. There is inadequate reason to move away from the intuitively attractive view that we have a faculty of intuition, in many