How Many Variables Can Humans Process?

@article{Halford2005HowMV,
  title={How Many Variables Can Humans Process?},
  author={Graeme S. Halford and Rosemary Baker and Julie McCredden and John D. Bain},
  journal={Psychological Science},
  year={2005},
  volume={16},
  pages={70 - 76}
}
The conceptual complexity of problems was manipulated to probe the limits of human information processing capacity. Participants were asked to interpret graphically displayed statistical interactions. In such problems, all independent variables need to be considered together, so that decomposition into smaller subtasks is constrained, and thus the order of the interaction directly determines conceptual complexity. As the order of the interaction increases, the number of variables increases… Expand

Figures, Tables, and Topics from this paper

Recognising relations: What can be learned from considering complexity
TLDR
This paper describes two experiments that vary the level of relational complexity across exemplars and found that relational recognition tasks benefit from increased complexity, while mapping tasks suffer from it. Expand
Are the limits in processing and storage capacity common? Exploring the additive and interactive effects of processing and storage load in working memory
Processing and storage constitute important aspects of working memory. However, the relationship between them remains unclear. If they constitute separate, independent capacities then manipulationsExpand
The relational integration task explains fluid reasoning above and beyond other working memory tasks
TLDR
In Experiment 3, by means of structural equation modeling and variance partitioning, the relation integration task was found to be the strongest predictor of fluid reasoning, explaining variance above and beyond the amounts accounted for by four other kinds of well-established working memory tasks. Expand
Separating cognitive capacity from knowledge: a new hypothesis
TLDR
This work proposes that working memory and reasoning share related capacity limits, and argues that both types of limit might be based on the limited ability to form and preserve bindings between elements in memory. Expand
Disentangling cognitive from perceptual load using relational complexity
ABSTRACT Debate centres on the difficulty to distinguish precisely whether cognitive or perceptual load determines performance in tasks such as the Halford Graphical Relational Complexity TaskExpand
Measuring the Influence of Complexity on Relational Reasoning
Relational complexity (RC) theory conceptualizes an individual’s processing capacity and a task’s complexity along a common ordinal metric. The authors describe the development of the Latin SquareExpand
Explanation as a Cognitive Process
TLDR
It is argued that research on explanation would benefit from more engagement with how the cognitive systems involved in generating explanations shape the outputs of this process, and outlined the proposed mechanistic approach to explanation. Expand
The influence of relational complexity and strategy selection on children's reasoning in the Latin Square Task
The present study focused on children's deductive reasoning when performing the Latin Square Task, an experimental task designed to explore the influence of relational complexity. Building on Birney,Expand
Spatial memory and executive functions in children
TLDR
A computerized hidden pathway maze-learning task was used to examine the development of spatial memory and executive functions in 6- to 9-year-olds and showed that maze matrix size and age interacted to affect executive functions but not spatial memory. Expand
The relationship between working memory and cognitive control : the role of task complexity, organisational strategies and task-switching on the task-span procedure
Humans are capable of remembering information in an active, easily accessible form. However, this is a limited capacity system, which temporarily maintains and stores information, and supports humanExpand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 27 REFERENCES
How Big Is a Chunk?
  • H. Simon
  • Computer Science, Medicine
  • Science
  • 1974
TLDR
It is shown that, by viewing experimentation in a parameter-estimating paradigm instead of a hypothesis-testing paradigm, one can obtain much more information from experiments—information that, combined with contemporary theoretical models of the cognitive processes, has implications for human performance on tasks quite different from those of the original experiments. Expand
A Componential Model of Human Interaction with Graphs: 1. Linear Regression Modeling
Task analyses served as the basis for developing the Mixed Arithmetic-Perceptual (MA-P)model, which proposes (1) that people interacting with common graphs to answer common questions apply a set ofExpand
Processing capacity defined by relational complexity: implications for comparative, developmental, and cognitive psychology.
TLDR
Embedded models of relational representations show that relations with more arguments have a higher computational cost that coincides with experimental findings on higher processing loads in humans, and the complexity of relations processed by children increases with age. Expand
A cognitive complexity metric applied to cognitive development
TLDR
Two experiments tested predictions from a theory in which processing load depends on relational complexity (RC), the number of variables related in a single decision, and the RC approach to defining cognitive complexity is applicable to different content domains. Expand
Recruitment of anterior dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in human reasoning: a parametric study of relational complexity.
TLDR
Functional magnetic resonance imaging is used to identify brain regions that respond selectively in processing high levels of relational complexity and provides evidence that brain regions specific to integrating complex relations among stimuli are distinct from those involved in coping with general task difficulty and with working-memory demands. Expand
The magical number seven plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information.
TLDR
The theory provides us with a yardstick for calibrating the authors' stimulus materials and for measuring the performance of their subjects, and the concepts and measures provided by the theory provide a quantitative way of getting at some of these questions. Expand
The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity
  • N. Cowan
  • Psychology, Medicine
  • Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  • 2001
TLDR
A wide variety of data on capacity limits suggesting that the smaller capacity limit in short-term memory tasks is real is brought together and a capacity limit for the focus of attention is proposed. Expand
Cognitive complexity of suppositional reasoning: An application of the relational complexity metric to the knight-knave task
TLDR
An application of the Method of Analysis of Relational Complexity (MARC) to suppositional reasoning in the knight—knave task is outlined and indicates that the relational complexity metric is a useful and parsimonious way to quantify complexity of reasoning tasks. Expand
Dividing Attention Without Alternation or Automaticity
SUMMARY Spelke, Hirst, and Neisser trained two subjects to copy unrelated words at dictation as they read and understood stories. The subjects' success was interpreted as evidence against theExpand
A System for Relational Reasoning in Human Prefrontal Cortex
The integration of multiple relations between mental representations is critical for higher level cognition. For both deductive- and inductive-reasoning tasks, patients with prefrontal damageExpand
...
1
2
3
...