How Lysenkoism Became Pseudoscience: Dobzhansky to Velikovsky

@article{Gordin2012HowLB,
  title={How Lysenkoism Became Pseudoscience: Dobzhansky to Velikovsky},
  author={Michael D. Gordin},
  journal={Journal of the History of Biology},
  year={2012},
  volume={45},
  pages={443-468}
}
  • M. Gordin
  • Published 2012
  • Art
  • Journal of the History of Biology
At some point in America in the 1940s, T. D. Lysenko’s neo-Lamarckian hereditary theories transformed from a set of disputed doctrines into a prime exemplar of “pseudoscience.” This paper explores the context in which this theory acquired this pejorative status by examining American efforts to refute Lysenkoism both before and after the famous August 1948 endorsement of Lysenko’s doctrines by the Stalinist state, with particular attention to the translation efforts of Theodosius Dobzhansky… 
A controversial idea as a cultural resource: The Lysenko controversy and discussions of genetics as a ‘democratic’ science in postwar Japan
  • K. Iida
  • Art
    Social studies of science
  • 2015
TLDR
Regarding Lysenko’s idea as a cultural resource could help to explain how and why it was treated differently in different places, and why a controversy emerged in certain contexts but not in others.
Nikolai Vavilov in the years of Stalin's ‘Revolution from Above’ (1929–1932)
This paper examines new evidence from Russian archives to argue that Soviet geneticist and plant breeder, Nikolai I. Vavilov's fate was sealed during the ‘Cultural Revolution’ (‘Revolution from
Soviet genetics and the communist party: was it all bad and wrong, or none at all?
  • M. Konashev
  • Biology
    History and philosophy of the life sciences
  • 2020
TLDR
Historians of science need to consider and explain the evolution and dependence of Soviet science in regards to the evolution of Soviet society, the Soviet state, and the Communist party.
Nothing in biology makes sense except in light of theology?
  • S. Dilley
  • Philosophy
    Studies in history and philosophy of biological and biomedical sciences
  • 2013
Engrams and biological regulation: What was “wrong” with organic memory?
The idea that offspring could inherit attributes or dispositions that their parents had acquired is associated with the thinking of Jean-Baptiste Lamarck. But the early twentieth century saw several
Feyerabend, funding, and the freedom of science: the case of traditional Chinese medicine
  • Jamie Shaw
  • Education
    European journal for philosophy of science
  • 2021
TLDR
This paper is to provide a comprehensive overview and analysis on Feyerabend’s views on the freedom of science and his social commentary on US science funding policy that follows therefrom.
Marxism and the Crisis in Modern Biology
Modern biology, especially biomedical research, is currently embroiled in crisis. This crisis is not unsurprising considering the bourgeois culture and philosophy that has guided scientific research
Screening Out Controversy: Human Genetics, Emerging Techniques of Diagnosis, and the Origins of the Social Issues Committee of the American Society of Human Genetics, 1964–1973
  • M. Mitchell
  • Political Science
    Journal of the history of biology
  • 2017
TLDR
It was not until 1973, after the committee’s modest success in organizing support for a retrospective public health study of PKU screening and following the legalization of abortion on demand, that the committee decided to take a more publicly engaged stance.
Controversial and Contradictory: Historical and Contemporary Apologies for (a Lack of) Faculty Academic Freedom
Although academic freedom is considered a pillar of the academy in the United States, little legal precedent has been established to legitimize faculty academic freedom. Moreover, no legislation or
How Much Knowledge is Worth Knowing? An American Intellectual Historian's Thoughts on the Geschichte des Wissens
  • S. Marchand
  • History
    Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte
  • 2019
TLDR
The origins and disadvantages of the new field known as Wissensgeschichte are investigated from the perspective of an American intellectual historian and it is argued that while some historians of science may be ready to embrace a new identity as historians of knowledge, this terminology remains baggy and invites facile applications of Foucauldian theory.
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 74 REFERENCES
Lysenko and the tragedy of Soviet science
Trofim Lysenko's campaign against genetics and biology during the era of Stalin and Khrushchev is one of the great tragedies of modern science. In the purges that Lysenko (1898-1976) instigated, even
A “second front” in Soviet genetics: The international dimension of the Lysenko controversy, 1944–1947
  • N. Krementsov
  • Political Science
    Journal of the history of biology
  • 1996
TLDR
The Lysenko controversy illustrates the profound impact of international events on Soviet science and suggests that its history cannot be understood as a result of exclusively domestic affairs, but should be explicated within a broader framework of interaction between Soviet domestic and international policies and between the Soviet and Western scientific communities.
I Lysenko's “Michurinist” Genetics
TLDR
An eminent Russian-born geneticist and former lecturer at the University of Leningrad analyzes Lysenko's theories and discusses their nineteenth-century origins and the motives of their present-day advocates.
Mankind in amnesia
Immanuel Velikovsky called this book the "fulfillment of his oath of Hippocrates to serve humanity." In this book he returns to his roots as a Science of new problems far beyond the velikovskianthe
The Velikovsky Affair: The Warfare of Science and Scientism . Edited by de Grazia Alfred. (New York: University Books, Inc., 1966. Pp. 260. $5.95.)
  • J. Orbell
  • Education
    American Political Science Review
  • 1967
niques are given, but throughout much of the book World War II examples are used to the virtual exclusion of current techniques. Also, the author has used few recent theoretical works. (Less than ten
The Lysenko Affair
TLDR
Joravsky has produced the most detailed and authoritative treatment of Lysenko and his view on genetics.
A new perspective on Lysenko?
TLDR
The Vavilov's sponsorship of Lysenko is set in the intellectual context of plant physiology circa 1930, and in the political climate of the pressing needs of Russian agriculture at that time.
The Private Science of Louis Pasteur
On the 100th anniversary of Louis Pasteur's death, Gerald Geison has written a controversial biography that finally penetrates the secrecy that has surrounded much of this legendary scientist's
The Demise of the Demarcation Problem
We live in a society which sets great store by science. Scientific ‘experts’ play a privileged role in many of our institutions, ranging from the courts of law to the corridors of power. At a more
Many Are the Crimes: McCarthyism in America
The McCarthy Era was a bad time for freedom in America. Encompassing far more than the brief career of Senator Joseph McCarthy, it was the most widespread episode of political repression in the
...
...