How Lysenkoism Became Pseudoscience: Dobzhansky to Velikovsky

@article{Gordin2012HowLB,
  title={How Lysenkoism Became Pseudoscience: Dobzhansky to Velikovsky},
  author={Michael D. Gordin},
  journal={Journal of the History of Biology},
  year={2012},
  volume={45},
  pages={443-468}
}
  • M. Gordin
  • Published 2012
  • Philosophy, Medicine
  • Journal of the History of Biology
At some point in America in the 1940s, T. D. Lysenko’s neo-Lamarckian hereditary theories transformed from a set of disputed doctrines into a prime exemplar of “pseudoscience.” This paper explores the context in which this theory acquired this pejorative status by examining American efforts to refute Lysenkoism both before and after the famous August 1948 endorsement of Lysenko’s doctrines by the Stalinist state, with particular attention to the translation efforts of Theodosius Dobzhansky… Expand

Topics from this paper

A controversial idea as a cultural resource: The Lysenko controversy and discussions of genetics as a ‘democratic’ science in postwar Japan
  • K. Iida
  • Sociology, Medicine
  • Social studies of science
  • 2015
TLDR
Regarding Lysenko’s idea as a cultural resource could help to explain how and why it was treated differently in different places, and why a controversy emerged in certain contexts but not in others. Expand
Lysenkoism Against Genetics: The Meeting of the Lenin All-Union Academy of Agricultural Sciences of August 1948, Its Background, Causes, and Aftermath
TLDR
The triumph of Lysenkoism became complete and genetics was fully defeated in August 1948 at a session of the academy headed by Lysenko, which marked the USSR’s commitment to developing a national science, separated from the global scientific community. Expand
Nikolai Vavilov in the years of Stalin's ‘Revolution from Above’ (1929–1932)
This paper examines new evidence from Russian archives to argue that Soviet geneticist and plant breeder, Nikolai I. Vavilov's fate was sealed during the ‘Cultural Revolution’ (‘Revolution fromExpand
Soviet genetics and the communist party: was it all bad and wrong, or none at all?
  • M. Konashev
  • Medicine, History
  • History and philosophy of the life sciences
  • 2020
TLDR
Historians of science need to consider and explain the evolution and dependence of Soviet science in regards to the evolution of Soviet society, the Soviet state, and the Communist party. Expand
Nothing in biology makes sense except in light of theology?
  • S. Dilley
  • Philosophy, Medicine
  • Studies in history and philosophy of biological and biomedical sciences
  • 2013
This essay analyzes Theodosius Dobzhansky's famous article, "Nothing in Biology Makes Sense Except in the Light of Evolution," in which he presents some of his best arguments for evolution. I contendExpand
Engrams and biological regulation: What was “wrong” with organic memory?
The idea that offspring could inherit attributes or dispositions that their parents had acquired is associated with the thinking of Jean-Baptiste Lamarck. But the early twentieth century saw severalExpand
Feyerabend, funding, and the freedom of science: the case of traditional Chinese medicine
  • Jamie Shaw
  • Medicine
  • European journal for philosophy of science
  • 2021
TLDR
This paper is to provide a comprehensive overview and analysis on Feyerabend’s views on the freedom of science and his social commentary on US science funding policy that follows therefrom. Expand
Marxism and the Crisis in Modern Biology
Modern biology, especially biomedical research, is currently embroiled in crisis. This crisis is not unsurprising considering the bourgeois culture and philosophy that has guided scientific researchExpand
It’s OK to Talk About It: Exceptions to the Ingelfinger Rule
F inding that a newway of organizing his clinic had improved patient care and reduced costs, a prospective author asked if he could send the draft manuscript describing it to his hospital leadershipExpand
Screening Out Controversy: Human Genetics, Emerging Techniques of Diagnosis, and the Origins of the Social Issues Committee of the American Society of Human Genetics, 1964–1973
  • M. Mitchell
  • Political Science, Medicine
  • Journal of the history of biology
  • 2017
TLDR
It was not until 1973, after the committee’s modest success in organizing support for a retrospective public health study of PKU screening and following the legalization of abortion on demand, that the committee decided to take a more publicly engaged stance. Expand
...
1
2
3
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 76 REFERENCES
Lysenko and the tragedy of Soviet science
Trofim Lysenko's campaign against genetics and biology during the era of Stalin and Khrushchev is one of the great tragedies of modern science. In the purges that Lysenko (1898-1976) instigated, evenExpand
A “second front” in Soviet genetics: The international dimension of the Lysenko controversy, 1944–1947
TLDR
The Lysenko controversy illustrates the profound impact of international events on Soviet science and suggests that its history cannot be understood as a result of exclusively domestic affairs, but should be explicated within a broader framework of interaction between Soviet domestic and international policies and between the Soviet and Western scientific communities. Expand
I Lysenko's “Michurinist” Genetics
One of the most dramatic developments in Soviet science occurred in the summer of 1948, when genetics was suppressed in favor of the biological theories of a Soviet agronomist, T. D. Lysenko.Expand
Mankind in amnesia
Immanuel Velikovsky called this book the "fulfillment of his oath of Hippocrates to serve humanity." In this book he returns to his roots as a Science of new problems far beyond the velikovskiantheExpand
The Lysenko Affair
TLDR
Joravsky has produced the most detailed and authoritative treatment of Lysenko and his view on genetics. Expand
A new perspective on Lysenko?
TLDR
The Vavilov's sponsorship of Lysenko is set in the intellectual context of plant physiology circa 1930, and in the political climate of the pressing needs of Russian agriculture at that time. Expand
The Private Science of Louis Pasteur
On the 100th anniversary of Louis Pasteur's death, Gerald Geison has written a controversial biography that finally penetrates the secrecy that has surrounded much of this legendary scientist'sExpand
Nonsense on Stilts: How to Tell Science from Bunk
Recent polls suggest that fewer than 40 per cent of Americans believe in Darwin's theory of evolution, despite it being one of science's best-established findings. More and more parents are refusingExpand
The Demise of the Demarcation Problem
We live in a society which sets great store by science. Scientific ‘experts’ play a privileged role in many of our institutions, ranging from the courts of law to the corridors of power. At a moreExpand
Many Are the Crimes: McCarthyism in America
The McCarthy Era was a bad time for freedom in America. Encompassing far more than the brief career of Senator Joseph McCarthy, it was the most widespread episode of political repression in theExpand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...