How Do Scientists Respond to Anomalies? Different Strategies Used in Basic and Applied Science

@article{Trickett2009HowDS,
  title={How Do Scientists Respond to Anomalies? Different Strategies Used in Basic and Applied Science},
  author={Susan Bell Trickett and J. Gregory Trafton and Christian D. Schunn},
  journal={Topics in cognitive science},
  year={2009},
  volume={1 4},
  pages={711-29}
}
We conducted two in vivo studies to explore how scientists respond to anomalies. Based on prior research, we identify three candidate strategies: mental simulation, mental manipulation of an image, and comparison between images. In Study 1, we compared experts in basic and applied domains (physics and meteorology). We found that the basic scientists used mental simulation to resolve an anomaly, whereas applied science practitioners mentally manipulated the image. In Study 2, we compared novice… CONTINUE READING

From This Paper

Figures, tables, results, connections, and topics extracted from this paper.
13 Extracted Citations
18 Extracted References
Similar Papers

Citing Papers

Publications influenced by this paper.

Referenced Papers

Publications referenced by this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 18 references

conceptual simulation, pure spatial transformation, and comparison spatial transformation, and we Fig

  • General discussion We have identified three distinct, albeit related, problem-solving strategies used in scientific reasoning, particularly among scientists using complex visual displays of data
  • 2. Mean number (with standard error bars) of…
  • 2009

Connecting internal and external representations : Spatial transformations of scientific visualizations

  • J. G. Trafton, S. B. Trickett, F. E. Mintz
  • Foundations of Science
  • 2005

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…