How Democracies Use Intervention: A Neglected Dimension in Studies of the Democratic Peace

@article{Kegley1996HowDU,
  title={How Democracies Use Intervention: A Neglected Dimension in Studies of the Democratic Peace},
  author={Charles W. Kegley and Margaret G. Hermann},
  journal={Journal of Peace Research},
  year={1996},
  volume={33},
  pages={309 - 322}
}
Confidence has grown in the finding that democracies do not wage war against one another. Two decades of empirical investigation that support this proposition, in conjunction with the recent expansion of the democratic community, have understandably inspired hope in the `democratic peace' envisioned by Immanuel Kant and Woodrow Wilson. This article collates three streams of previously unexamined evidence that speak to the promise of this hope. Looking cross-nationally at the incidence of overt… 

A Peace Dividend? Democracies' Military Interventions and Their External Political Consequences

Numerous empirical investigations have found that democracies do not wage war against one another. This finding has inspired hope that the rapid worldwide dispersion of democracy since the mid-1970s

Democracies and Intervention: Is there a Danger Zone in the Democratic Peace?

By overlooking the full range of studies of democracy and intervention that we have undertaken, Tures misrepresents our intentions and our evidence. To clarify the definable patterns within

Putting Military Intervention into the Democratic Peace

Although many empirical investigations have demonstrated that democracies almost never wage war against one another, there remains some doubt whether this empirical law applies to other kinds of

Democracies as Intervening States: A Critique of Kegley & Hermann

The Democratic Peace Proposition, which contends that no two democracies have gone to war with each other, has been challenged by scholars who claim that such an argument does not apply to lower

Democratic Jihad ? Military Intervention and Democracy 1

Democracies rarely if ever fight one another, but they participate in wars as frequently as autocracies. They tend to win the wars that they participate in. Democracies frequently build large

Democratic Jihad? Military Intervention and Democracy

Democracies rarely if ever fight one another, but they participate in wars as frequently as autocracies. They tend to win the wars in which they participate. Democracies frequently build large

Measures of Democratization: From Degree to Type to War

The global spread of democracy has not resulted in scholarly consensus on how to conceptualize and measure democratization. The recent proliferation of hybrid regimes has encouraged attempts to

The democratic peace proposition: An agenda for critical analysis

The proposition that democracies are more peaceful than autocracies has spawned a huge literature. Much of the relevant quantitative research has shown that democracies indeed rarely, if ever, fight

Give Me Shelter: Reexamining Military Intervention and the Monadic Democratic Peace

Increasing empirical evidence points to the existence of a monadic democratic peace. However, the quantitative literature on international conflict has yet to produce any compelling evidence that

Addressing Concerns about Applying the Democratic Peace Arguments to Interventions

In their research agenda, Kegley and Hermann have made a major contribution by attempting to determine if the democratic peace proposition persists when applied to lower levels of conflict. However,
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 50 REFERENCES

Targets of covert pressure: The hidden victims of the democratic peace

The expanding literature on the relationship between democracy and international conflict continues to focus on two questions: Are democracies inherently more peaceful than other forms of government?

Democracy and the Peaceful Settlement of International Conflict

  • W. J. Dixon
  • Political Science
    American Political Science Review
  • 1994
The research reported here develops an explanation for the often-noted absence of international war between democratic states. This explanation is derived from a theoretical rationale centered on

Rethinking Democracy and International Peace: Perspectives from Political Psychology

The intent of this article is to expand our understanding of the “zone of peace” that appears to surround democracies by proposing several explanations derived from psychological theories. These

Democracy and International Conflict: An Evaluation of the Democratic Peace Proposition

In Democracy and International Conflict James Lee Ray defends the idea, so optimistically advanced by diplomats in the wake of the Soviet Union's demise and so hotly debated by international

Democracy and Peace

The observation that democracies rarely if ever fight each other was made by Dean Babst nearly three decades ago, but has had little impact on the literature on peace research and international

Grasping the Democratic Peace: Principles for a Post-Cold War World

By illuminating the conflict-resolving mechanisms inherent in the relationships between democracies, Bruce Russett explains one of the most promising developments of the modern international system:

Domestic Structure and Preventive War: Are Democracies More Pacific?

Realists have long viewed uneven rates of growth among states as a major cause of wars. According to strict logic of realpolitik, a declining dominant power should launch a preventive war against a

Can a democratic peace be built

If democracies rarely fight each other, what implications does that hold for contemporary foreign policy? To be “democratic” in a manner that will promote peace, democracy must be stable, with

Democracy, War, and Covert Action

It is well established that stable industrialized democracies do not use overt force against each other. But do democracies ever use covert force against other elected governments? This article

The Transformation of the Western State: The Growth of Democracy, Autocracy, and State Power Since 1800

This article uses POLITY II, a new dataset on the authority traits of 155 countries, to assess some general historical arguments about the dynamics of political change in Europe and Latin America