How Basic Are Behavioral Biases? Evidence from Capuchin Monkey Trading Behavior

  title={How Basic Are Behavioral Biases? Evidence from Capuchin Monkey Trading Behavior},
  author={M. Keith Chen and Venkat R. Lakshminarayanan and Laurie R Santos},
  journal={Journal of Political Economy},
  pages={517 - 537}
Behavioral economics has demonstrated systematic decision‐making biases in both lab and field data. Do these biases extend across contexts, cultures, or even species? We investigate this question by introducing fiat currency and trade to a colony of capuchin monkeys and recovering their preferences over a range of goods and gambles. We show that capuchins react rationally to both price and wealth shocks but display several hallmark biases when faced with gambles, including reference dependence… 
Capuchin monkeys do not show human-like pricing effects
Although monkeys demonstrated an understanding of which goods had which prices (consistently shifting preferences to cheaper goods when prices were increased), there was no evidence that such price information affected their valuation of different kinds of goods, suggesting that human pricing effects may involve more sophisticated human-unique cognitive capacities, such as a understanding of market forces and signaling.
On loss aversion in capuchin monkeys.
Three experiments with monkeys and humans consistent with a reinterpretation of their data that attributes their results not to loss aversion, but to differences between choice alternatives in delay of reinforcement are presented.
Chen, Lakshminarayanan, and Santos (2006) claim to show in three choice experiments that monkeys react rationally to price and wealth shocks, but, when faced with gambles, display hallmark,
Endowment effect in capuchin monkeys
The data suggest that biased preferences rely on cognitive systems that are more evolutionarily ancient than previously thought—and that common evolutionary ancestry shared by humans and capuchins may account for the occurrence of the endowment effect in both species.
Magnitude-sensitive preference formation
A theory of magnitude-sensitive preference learning is developed that permits an agent to rationally infer its preferences for items compared with money options of different magnitudes and is shown how this theory yields classical and anomalous supply-demand curves and predicts choices for a large panel of risky lotteries.
Why Do Individuals Exhibit Investment Biases
Where do behavioral biases aecting investment decisions come from? We nd that a signicant proportion (about 20 to 56%) of investment biases such as home bias, loss aversion, performance chasing as
Evolved Irrationality? Equity and the Origins of Human Economic Behavior
While the economic approach to human decision-making characterizes our choices in terms of how we maximize utility, in many cases, such an approach fails to predict the decisions we actually make.
The Evolution of Our Preferences: Insights from Non-human Primates
Publisher Summary This chapter discusses how choice changes preferences in adult humans and the origins of choice-based preference reversals. If decision-making researchers knew that some experiences
Skew and Trend Aversion
Despite evidence of the benefits to portfolio Sharpe ratio and variance, actual investor allocations to Trend Following strategies are typically 5% or less. Why is there such a significant
On the flexibility of basic risk attitudes in monkeys
Monkeys and other animals appear to share with humans two risk attitudes predicted by prospect theory: an inverse-S-shaped probability weighting function and a steeper utility curve for losses than


Commodity-Choice Behavior with Pigeons as Subjects
Starting from an initial (baseline) budget line, income-compensated price changes always resulted in substitution effects consistent with the Slutsky-Hicks theory. This behavior cannot be explained
Prospect Theory In The Wild: Evidence From The Field
The workhorses of economic analysis are simple formal models that can explain naturally occurring phenomena. Reflecting this taste, economists often say they will incorporate more psychological
Anomalies: The Endowment Effect, Loss Aversion, and Status Quo Bias
A wine-loving economist we know purchased some nice Bordeaux wines years ago at low prices. The wines have greatly appreciated in value, so that a bottle that cost only $10 when purchased would now
Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem
Contrary to theoretical expectations, measures of willingness to accept greatly exceed measures of willingness to pay. This paper reports several experiments that demonstrate that this "endowment
Monkeys reject unequal pay
It is demonstrated that a nonhuman primate, the brown capuchin monkey (Cebus apella), responds negatively to unequal reward distribution in exchanges with a human experimenter, supporting an early evolutionary origin of inequity aversion.
Loss Aversion and Seller Behaviour: Evidence from the Housing Market
Data from downtown Boston in the 1990s show that loss aversion determines seller behavior in the housing market. Condominium owners subject to nominal losses 1) set higher asking prices of 25-35
Myopic Loss Aversion and the Equity Premium Puzzle
The equity premium puzzle, first documented by Mehra and Prescott, refers to the empirical fact that stocks have greatly outperformed bonds over the last century. As Mehra and Prescott point out, it
Socially learned preferences for differentially rewarded tokens in the brown capuchin monkey (Cebus apella).
The authors tested capuchins for their ability to learn the value of novel tokens using a previously familiar token-exchange economy, and found capuchin monkeys seem to pay more attention in a social situation involving novel tokens.
Are Investors Reluctant to Realize Their Losses?
I test the disposition effect, the tendency of investors to hold losing investments too long and sell winning investments too soon, by analyzing trading records for 10,000 accounts at a large
Loss Aversion in Riskless Choice: A Reference-Dependent Model
Much experimental evidence indicates that choice depends on the status quo or reference level: changes of reference point often lead to reversals of preference. We present a reference-dependent