Holdups, Standard Breach Remedies, and Optimal Investment

@article{Edlin1995HoldupsSB,
  title={Holdups, Standard Breach Remedies, and Optimal Investment},
  author={Aaron Edlin and Stefan Reichelstein},
  journal={Remedies eJournal},
  year={1995}
}
We consider a bilateral trading problem in which one or both parties makes relationship-specific investments before trade. Without adequate contractual protection, the prospect of later holdups discourages investment. We postulate that the parties can sign noncontingent contracts prior to investing, and can freely renegotiate them after uncertainty about the desirability of trade is resolved. We find that such contracts can induce one party to invest efficiently when either a breach remedy of… 

Standard Breach Remedies, Quality Thresholds, and Cooperative Investments

When investments are non-verifiable, inducing cooperative investments with simple contracts may not be as difficult as previously thought. Indeed, modeling 'expectation damages' close to legal

Expectation Damages, Divisible Contracts, and Bilateral Investment

This paper examines the efficiency of expectation damages as a breach remedy in a bilateral trade setting with renegotiation and relationship-specific investment by the buyer and the seller. As

Breach Remedies Inducing Hybrid Investments

Contract Damages and Cooperative Investments

We study alternative breach remedies in the presence of specific investments that generate a direct benefit to the investor's trading partner (referred to as "cooperative investments."). We find that

Strategic Shirking in Bilateral Trade*

This paper explores a version of the canonical holdup model where agents undertake specific investments prior to their transaction. In this setting, we identify a novel reason for contractual

Expectation Damages , Divisible Contracts , and Bilateral Investment by Susanne Ohlendorf

We consider a bilateral trade setting with costless renegotiation and investment by both the buyer and the seller. Whether first best levels of relationship-specific investment can be induced by a

Strategic Shirking in Bilateral Trade by Christoph Lülfesmann

This paper considers a version of the standard holdup model, in which a buyer and a seller can undertake relationship specific investments before conducting their transaction. In this setting, we

Expectation Damages and Bilateral Cooperative Investments

We examine the efficiency of the standard breach remedy expectation damages in a setting of bilateral cooperative investment by a buyer and a seller. Contracts may specify a required quality level

Optimal Contract Design with Unilateral Market Option

Contrary to previous literature, we show that the assignment of authority decision matters in optimal contract design with bilateral specific self-investments. This is the case when we enlarge the

Contract Design When Relationship-Specific Investment Produces Asymmetric Information

Under conventional contract theory, contracts may be efficient by protecting relationship-specific investment from holdup in subsequent (re)negotiation over terms of trade. This paper demonstrates a
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 35 REFERENCES

Investments, Holdup, and the Form of Market Contracts.

The authors analyze incomplete contracts to induce efficient investment. With exogenous switching costs, fixed-price contracts are efficient, generate some rigidity in prices, are renegotiated

Incomplete Contracts, Specific Investments, and Risk Sharing

An optimal contract design problem is considered. Contracts which are incomplete and simple are used to investigate the extent to which constrained revisions can mitigate inefficiencies resulting

The Economics of Liquidated Damage Clauses in Contractual Environments with Private Information

This paper considers trading environments in which buyers are privately informed about their valuations and sellers are privately informed about the expected value of outside trading opportunities.

On the Efficiency of Privately Stipulated Damages for Breach of Contract: Entry Barriers, Reliance, and Renegotiation

Two roles for stipulated damage provisions have been debated in the literature: protecting relationship-specific investments and inefficiently excluding competitors. Aghion and Bolton (1987) formally

Incomplete Contracts and Renegotiation

When drawing up a contract, it is often impracticable to specify all the relevant contingencies, and so contracts are typically incomplete. This paper considers the extent to which these gaps migh t

Efficient reliance and damage measures for breach of contract

This article considers a situation where the buyer or the seller of a good must engage in expenditures on specific capital before the exchange either to prepare to use the product or to prepare to

Efficient Contracting with Reliance and a Damage Measure

This article reexamines the problem of breach of contract studied by Shavell (1980, 1984) and Rogerson (1984) by considering explicitly the incentive problems that arise from asymmetric information

On renegotiation design

Vertical Integration, Appropriable Rents, and the Competitive Contracting Process

The potential of post-contractural apportunistic behavior for improving market efficiency through intrafirm rather than interfirm transactions is examined under the assumption that vertical costs

The Excess Sensitivity of Layoffs and Quits to Demand

Excessive layoffs in bad times and excessive quits in good times both stem from the same weakness in practical employment arrangements: the specific nature of worker-firm relations creates a