Holding People Responsible for Ethical Violations: The Surprising Benefits of Accusing Others

@inproceedings{Kennedy2015HoldingPR,
  title={Holding People Responsible for Ethical Violations: The Surprising Benefits of Accusing Others},
  author={J. Kennedy},
  year={2015}
}
Individuals who accuse others of unethical behavior can derive significant benefits. Compared to individuals who do not make accusations, accusers engender greater trust and are perceived to have h... 

Figures and Tables from this paper

Trust promotes unethical behavior: excessive trust, opportunistic exploitation, and strategic exploitation
Trust is critical for our cooperation and effective working relationships, but trust also enables exploitation and unethical behavior . Prior trust research has disproportionately focused on theExpand
The impact of leaders’ character on subordinates’ attitudes and behavior towards their work and leader
The concept of character found its way into the study and discussion of leadership several years ago. Reasons for this emergence mentioned in the leadership literature ranged from corporateExpand
Reconfiguring Rights in Austerity Britain: Boundaries, Behaviours and Contestable Margins
  • L. Morris
  • Political Science
  • Journal of Social Policy
  • 2018
Abstract This paper addresses policy change in Britain since 2010 across the three fields of domestic welfare, migration and asylum, and analyses the association between welfare, conditionality andExpand

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 106 REFERENCES
Who's with Me? False Consensus, Brokerage, and Ethical Decision Making in Organizations
We propose that organization members overestimate the degree to which others share their views on ethical matters. Further, we argue that being a broker in an advice network exacerbates this false ...
Prosocial Lies: When Deception Breeds Trust
Philosophers, psychologists, and economists have long asserted that deception harms trust. We challenge this claim. We break new ground by demonstrating that some types of deception increase trust....
Doing as They Would Do: How the Perceived Ethical Preferences of Third-Party Beneficiaries Impact Ethical Decision-Making
Although unethical behavior often benefits third-parties not directly complicit in the misconduct, not all beneficiaries welcome these ill-gotten benefits. We investigate whether actors consider theExpand
People as intuitive prosecutors: The impact of social-control goals on attributions of responsibility
Three experiments explored determinants of punitive character attributions to norm violators. Experiment 1 showed that ideological conservatism and manipulated threat to society increased anger andExpand
PEER REPORTING OF UNETHICAL BEHAVIOR: A SOCIAL CONTEXT PERSPECTIVE
This research hypothesized that two social context conditions influence group members' evaluations of peer reporting of unethical behavior and their own inclination to report peers: the misconductExpand
Removing the shadow of suspicion: the effects of apology versus denial for repairing competence- versus integrity-based trust violations.
TLDR
Investigation of the implications of an apology versus a denial for repairing trust after an alleged violation revealed that trust was repaired more successfully when mistrusted parties apologized for violations concerning matters of competence but denied culpability for violationscerning matters of integrity. Expand
The effectiveness of corporate communicative responses to accusations of unethical behavior
When corporations are accused of unethical behaviour by external actors, executives from those organizations are usually compelled to offer communicative responses to defend their corporate image. ToExpand
It hurts both ways: How social comparisons harm affective and cognitive trust
Organizations often expect employees to collaborate with and trust the same coworkers with whom they compete for promotions and raises. This paper explores how social comparisons in self-relevantExpand
BEING FAIR OR APPEARING FAIR: STRATEGIC BEHAVIOR IN ULTIMATUM BARGAINING
This article presents the results of two experiments that investigated fairness and apparent fairness in ultimatum negotiations. Results suggest that offerers—those presenting offers—were both stra...
The pot calling the kettle black: distancing response to ethical dissonance.
TLDR
These findings indicate that to reduce ethical dissonance, individuals use a double-distancing mechanism that is exclusive for ethical dissonances and is not triggered by salience of ethicality, general sense of personal failure, or ethically neutral cognitive dissonance. Expand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...