Hobbes on Natural Right in Society: The Leviathan Account

@article{Carmichael1990HobbesON,
  title={Hobbes on Natural Right in Society: The Leviathan Account},
  author={D. J. C. Carmichael},
  journal={Canadian Journal of Political Science},
  year={1990},
  volume={23},
  pages={3 - 21}
}
  • D. Carmichael
  • Published 1 March 1990
  • Philosophy
  • Canadian Journal of Political Science
Abstract This article examines Hobbes' conception of natural right in society as presented in Part Two of Leviathan (primarily chapters 21 and 26 through 28). In contrast to Hobbes' earlier works, this section contains an implicit but important account of natural rights (called “true liberties”) in society and a corresponding set of restrictions on the proper use of law and punishment. Authority is thus absolute, but its proper use is limited. I argue that these limits are significant, that… 

Leviathan No More: The Right of Nature and the Limits of Sovereignty in Hobbes

Abstract This article challenges the prevailing interpretations of Hobbes's thought as providing only minimal protection for the natural right of individuals in political society. Natural right

The recovery of natural law for the sociology of human rights

This thesis argues that the sociology of human rights is more restricted in its treatment of natural law than it should be. In building this argument the thesis explores the different ways in which

Sovereignty, society and human rights: Theorising society and human survival in times of global crisis

The coronavirus pandemic and climate crisis have highlighted the power of governments in relation to people and the societies in which they live. This article looks at two sociological approaches

Routledge Philosophy GuideBook to Hobbes and Leviathan

Introduction 1. Hobbes Life 2. Leviathan: The Book 3. Human Knowledge, Reason and Ignorance 4. The State of Nature: Law and Right 5. State of Nature to Commonwealth 6. Contract and Consent 7.

Orders and obedience: structure and agency

Purpose – The major thesis of this article is how social contract theory sheds light on the interaction of structure and agency. A minor thesis is to rebut the conclusions drawn from Stanley

Hobbes on Resistance: Defying the Leviathan

Acknowledgements Introduction 1. Hobbes's right of self-defense 2. The true liberties of subjects 3. Limited obedience to an unlimited sovereign 4. Is Leviathan a 'Rebel's Catechism'? Conclusion

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 10 REFERENCES

Hobbes and the social contract tradition

Acknowledgments A note on texts and references Introduction 1. 'Of Man': the foundation of Hobbe's political argument 2. What is the cause of conflict in the state of nature? 3. The shortsightedness

Perspectives on Thomas Hobbes

G.A.J. Rogers: Introduction Richard Tuck: Hobbes and Descartes Noel Malcolm: Hobbes and the Royal Society Tom Sorell: The science in Hobbes's politics Alan Ryan: Hobbes and individualism Francois

Hobbes & the Coleman Thesis

In his well-known book, Hobbes and America: Exploring the Constitutional Foundations (1977), Frank Coleman characterized Hobbes' political theory as liberal democratic and, therefore, as an

Natural Rights Theories: Their Origin and Development

Preface Introduction 1. The first rights theory 2. The Renaissance 3. Hugo Grotius 4. John Selden 5. Selden's followers 6. Thomas Hobbes 7. The radical theory 8. The recovery and repudiation of

Hobbes's political theory

The Hobbesian covenants - rights the Hobbesian covenants - political agency, authorisation and representation Hobbesian absolutism Hobbesian roles the art of government Hobbes's political sensibility.

Behemoth; Or, the Long Parliament

List of Abbreviations List of Illustrations General Introduction Textual Introduction 1. To the Right Honourable Sr. Henry Bennet Baron of Arlington 2. First Dialogue 3. Second Dialogue 4. Third

The Right of Nature in Leviathan

Hobbes’ account of these issues is conspicuously brief and puzzling. Indeed it has been criticized by some commentators as ‘confused.’ I hope to show, however, that it appears confused only because